my profile |
register |
faq |
search upload photo | donate | calendar |
02-05-2005, 05:44 PM | #1 |
RIP
Patron LugerForum Patron Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Hot & Dry PHX, AZ
Posts: 2,078
Thanks: 24
Thanked 163 Times in 87 Posts
|
1936 S/42 Interesting Transitions
The photo shows a G-Date, 1936 G-Block, 1936 H-Block and a 1936 K-Block. The Germans made two small changes in the design between the G-Date and 1936. The first was to make a larger radius behind the barrel band that contains the front sight. The second was to change the size of the "S" in the S/42 on the mid toggle link so the "S" and "42" were the same size. Also of note is the "42" changed design from a closed "4" to a more open "4". It may be hard to see, but it's there!
Actually, they made three changes. Later they changed the design of the proof mark from the Early Test Proof Mark (ETP) to the Mid Proof Test Mark (MTP) near the beginning of the L/M-Block. But this transition only pertains to the EPM. The photo shows the G-Date and the 1936 G-Block have the smaller radius, the other two have the larger, full radius. Also shown is the 1936 K-Block has the S/42 all the same size, the other three have the large "S" in the S/42. So Mauser used all the piece parts they could making some interesting transitions. The sharp radius barrel bands and the large "S" in the S/42 mid toggle link are all from the 1935 (G-Date) production. I am reasonably sure that these parts are mixed in for 1936 production in the F, G and H Blocks and maybe higher. Now the question: Has anyone seen a 1936 with a sharp radius behind the barrel band in combination with a "standard" 1936 mid toggle link? Last edited by Frank; 02-07-2005 at 04:44 PM. |
02-06-2005, 06:51 AM | #2 |
Moderator
Lifetime LugerForum Patron Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Europe
Posts: 5,053
Thanks: 1,036
Thanked 3,989 Times in 1,205 Posts
|
Hi Frank,
I have another question. Have you ever observed traces of what appears to be a die impression just below the S/42? My late 1937 S/42 has this small impression mark just below the S/42 which looks like the rim of a die just slightly struck it there. |
02-06-2005, 09:11 AM | #3 |
RIP
Patron LugerForum Patron Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Hot & Dry PHX, AZ
Posts: 2,078
Thanks: 24
Thanked 163 Times in 87 Posts
|
Hi Gerben,
No I haven't noticed any die marks. But, I wasn't looking for them. The next time I have a chance to look, I will and report any that I see. What 1937 Block (suffix) was the die mark found? |
02-06-2005, 11:06 AM | #4 |
Moderator
2010 LugerForum Patron Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Santa Teresa New Mexico just outside of the West Texas town of El Paso
Posts: 7,022
Thanks: 1,090
Thanked 5,179 Times in 1,703 Posts
|
Nice presentation Frank! This forum is ideal for this kind of educational material. Glad to see you and others taking the time to expand the knowledge of the Luger community. Thank you.
__________________
If it's made after 1918...it's a reproduction |
02-06-2005, 04:17 PM | #5 |
RIP
Patron LugerForum Patron Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Hot & Dry PHX, AZ
Posts: 2,078
Thanks: 24
Thanked 163 Times in 87 Posts
|
Thanks Ron, I appreciate your comments! Especially coming from you; because you do the same thing for the prototype Lugers as I try to do for the full up production models!!
|
02-07-2005, 01:18 PM | #6 |
Moderator
Lifetime LugerForum Patron Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Europe
Posts: 5,053
Thanks: 1,036
Thanked 3,989 Times in 1,205 Posts
|
Hi Frank,
The block was the late 1937 b-block. I have to agree with Ron, you're starting to get to the point where you surpass Herr August Weiss's knowledge on Mauser lugers |
02-07-2005, 02:54 PM | #7 |
Super Moderator
Eternal Lifer LugerForum Patron Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: North of Spokane, WA
Posts: 15,935
Thanks: 2,034
Thanked 4,533 Times in 2,093 Posts
|
Thanks Frank, the photographic representation like this is great for the rest of us, thanks for doing it!
Ed |
02-07-2005, 04:46 PM | #8 |
RIP
Patron LugerForum Patron Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Hot & Dry PHX, AZ
Posts: 2,078
Thanks: 24
Thanked 163 Times in 87 Posts
|
Thanks all, I added a note to the initial post regarding the design change in the figure "4" in the S/42. Like I said it's hard to see, but it's there!!
|
|
|