my profile |
register |
faq |
search upload photo | donate | calendar |
11-18-2005, 03:20 PM | #1 |
User
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 69
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Finnish P08 - What year?
I wonder if anyone here can shed some light on a P08 which doesn't have that many markings on it.
What I can tell: It's marked with serial 277 no suffix letter. DWM on top. Magazine has wooden buttom, marked SA. Barrel is stamped with Tikka's maker mark. No doubt this P08 has served it's duty in Finland. A m/23 7.65mm that has been converted to 9mm (?). Blueing quite worn. Most likely original jugded on condition (strangely barrel is the worst). Apart from the two finnish parts everything else is matching numbers. On the trigger there's a small stamp which looks like a crown over the letter C or a badly stamped circle (hard to see even with magnifier)? Something is inside the C/circle. Impossible to identify, too small. Grips shells are wood with no markings inside. Please can someone help finding out the history of such a P08 and what year it might be? |
11-18-2005, 03:59 PM | #2 |
User
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Portland, Oregon
Posts: 3,902
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1,318 Times in 431 Posts
|
Could you describe any/all other markings on the gun? Got pictures?
--Dwight |
11-19-2005, 09:15 AM | #3 |
User
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 69
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Well the problem is that there aren't that many other marks.
I've found some rather scattered marks. An X, a V and a C on the frame hidden behind the grip shells. Just above the trigger hidden behind the "takedown plate" is a 4 and a P. The number 4 is also stamped near the barrel on the "slide" along with an & and two I's. Inside the frame is an encircled N. To the right in the picture you can see 75 which is a serial stamp (?). That is odd since the serial is actually 277. It seems strange that this part has been replaced but none other (except for the Tikka barrel)? |
11-19-2005, 09:19 AM | #4 |
User
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 69
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
The "slide".
|
11-20-2005, 07:07 AM | #5 |
New User
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 4
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Hi!
I doubt it did service in Finland, i think it's is a DWM imported after the war to Finland and converted with a finnish competition barrel. It's quite common to find P08's in Scandinavia with finnish competition barrels. |
11-20-2005, 01:00 PM | #6 |
Patron
LugerForum Patron Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: POB 398 St.Charles,MO. 63302
Posts: 5,089
Thanks: 6
Thanked 736 Times in 483 Posts
|
byf, I can't see the Tikka marking on your barrel in photo. Usually these replacements were 125mm (5") long vise the normal 100mm PO8 barrel. For an idea of present value see the current SOG FLYER or www.southernohiogun.com for several variations for sale. TH
|
11-20-2005, 02:14 PM | #7 |
User
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Finland
Posts: 20
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Hello, new member here.
Interesting that the first thing I read here should be so familiar to me. Currently my only Parabellum is a shooter grade "mostly matching" m/23 that has been converted to 9mm using a Tikkakoski barrel. For what it's worth, here's a pic of the Tikkakoski stamp. Didn't know the longer barrels are more common, mine is 10cm/4". Mine doesn't have any SA stamps either so no telling when it has been converted. Shoots very well, though. I'm looking for a more collectible 7,65 one to go with it... |
11-20-2005, 03:07 PM | #8 |
User
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: The USA
Posts: 5,919
Thanks: 0
Thanked 6 Times in 4 Posts
|
Simo,
You might try this gun dealer in DE for a collector's piece... http://www.collector-arms.de/index.php?content=kurz |
11-20-2005, 04:28 PM | #9 |
User
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 69
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Same Tikka mark. On the upper side of the barrel. No SA marks except on the magazine.
Now if this is a "normal" German pistol imported to Finland after the war then why doesn't it have any German stamps on it? That's what confuses me, it has none of the typical marks? Last edited by byf43; 10-05-2009 at 05:59 AM. |
11-21-2005, 03:42 AM | #10 |
User
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Portland, Oregon
Posts: 3,902
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1,318 Times in 431 Posts
|
Mikkel,
There's not much to say from the info thus far. The holdopen is mismatch to the frame. The letters and symbols you describe are called "workers' marks", they are probably line inspection or completion stamps; there is no known index or "key" to their meaning. An odd notation, the circle-N stamp appears in the lug well of my 1917 LP-08, my 1917 Navy, -and- my Mauser 1936 S/42. The figure on the trigger suggests it might have originated with an Erfurt. Are there no serial numbers on any of the small parts? --Dwight |
11-21-2005, 11:28 AM | #11 |
User
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 69
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Thanks Dwight,
I suspected that the small marks were "worker" marks. What puzzles me is that there is no SA mark. If it's a post war import then at least there ought to be other marks i.e. Crown over N? When did the finnish army start stamping SA marks on their equipment? |
11-21-2005, 12:38 PM | #12 |
User
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Finland
Posts: 20
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
I believe a lot of Parabellums were imported into Finland between the first and second world war, and were sold commercially to private individuals, for example civil guard members.
Also the Tikkakoski 9mm barrels were made in the 30's I believe, and I would think most of the converting done before WW2? The idea of a lot of Parabellums being imported into Finland after WW2 sounds a bit strange to me, but I'm no expert so I'm not saying that's not true. Maybe this is common knowledge to more knowledgeable people? Would like to hear more if this is the case. It was much easier for private individuals to purchase handguns before WW2 than after so I'm not sure why large numbers of Parabellums would have been imported. My specimen is a typical commercial m/23 with all the normal German proof marks etc. and no SA property stamp. My assumption was that it was imported between the world wars, but what do I know... And as I wrote, of course no way to tell when it was converted. |
11-25-2005, 03:40 PM | #13 |
User
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Pa
Posts: 30
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
The Finnish Army started to use the [SA] stamp as their property marking around May of 1942. As with their rifles and other pieces of equipment not all of the Finnish hand guns received the [SA] stamp for what ever reason. I doubt that many Lugers were imported into Finalnd after the Wars.
|
11-26-2005, 07:46 AM | #14 |
User
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 69
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Alsky
Thanks for your comment. So it can in fact be a genuine finn 08. Last edited by byf43; 10-05-2009 at 06:00 AM. |
11-29-2005, 12:39 PM | #15 |
User
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Finland
Posts: 20
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
A discussion on a Finnish forum regarding the Tikkakoski barrels spurred me to ask:
Which are more common: Tikkakoski barrels without a serial number or with one? The few guys taking part in the "poll" on the Finnish forum seem to have about 50/50 but would be nice to hear international views on the matter. |
11-29-2005, 07:00 PM | #16 |
User
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Pa
Posts: 30
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
some__finn I have sent you a PM message.
|
|
|