my profile |
register |
faq |
search upload photo | donate | calendar |
04-21-2008, 09:03 PM | #1 |
User
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: The Edge of Texas
Posts: 514
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Mauser sighting
Okay, I have an Interarms Navy which I've shot a little. With the rear sight set for a 100 (meters?) the pistols shoots about a foot high at 40 yards with the ever popular Win. white box 115 gr..
Is this the usual thing? I haven't been able to shoot it at a hundred yards or more, but it would seem the bullet would still strike high. |
04-21-2008, 10:20 PM | #2 |
Lifer
Lifetime Forum Patron Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: The Capital of the Free World
Posts: 10,154
Thanks: 3,003
Thanked 2,306 Times in 1,097 Posts
|
Make sure you are shooting it stiff wristed, and try it at 100 meters and let us know how that works out...
__________________
regards, -John S "...We hold these truths to be self-evident that ALL men are created EQUAL and are endowed by their Creator with certain UNALIENABLE rights, and among these are life, LIBERTY, and the pursuit of happiness..." |
04-22-2008, 03:59 AM | #3 |
User
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 1,538
Thanks: 18
Thanked 36 Times in 21 Posts
|
@40 yards with sights on 100m, you should be 4.7 inches too high with your ammunition. With sights on 200m, one foot high would be right
__________________
Previously known as Morgan Kane |
04-22-2008, 10:50 AM | #4 |
User
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Orygun
Posts: 4,243
Thanks: 118
Thanked 245 Times in 150 Posts
|
Rod,
I think that sight regulation is a malady common to the Interarms Mauser Lugers. I've seen several used ones in gun shops over the years that have had the sights filed in various ways in an attempt to regulate them. Ron
__________________
I Still Need DWM side plate #49... if anyone runs across a nice one. What ~Rudyard Kipling~ said... |
04-22-2008, 11:05 AM | #5 |
User
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 1,538
Thanks: 18
Thanked 36 Times in 21 Posts
|
Another alternative; http://www.egun.de/market/item.php?id=1760949
..however, your Luger is not WAY off. As John said, trying it at 100m could be a good idea
__________________
Previously known as Morgan Kane |
04-23-2008, 08:25 AM | #6 |
User
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: The Edge of Texas
Posts: 514
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Thanks, guys. The problem with shooting at a hundred at the range I belong to is that the areas to do that are designated for rifle only. Maybe someday I can catch the range officer and get special "dispensation." My personal informal range at my mountain place is limited to 25 yards.
Ron, tht's very interesting about the filed sights. I sure don't want to do that and Steinar's replacement front sights might be the way to go. If the 200 yard setting is correspondingly off, which I assume it is, That could make hits at that range very problematic. |
04-23-2008, 10:01 AM | #7 | |
User
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 1,538
Thanks: 18
Thanked 36 Times in 21 Posts
|
Quote:
__________________
Previously known as Morgan Kane |
|
04-24-2008, 01:55 AM | #8 |
User
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: The Edge of Texas
Posts: 514
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Steinar, I actually knew that! I meant your suggestion of replacement front sights. Your help is appreciated!
|
04-25-2008, 09:59 AM | #9 |
Patron
LugerForum Patron Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: POB 398 St.Charles,MO. 63302
Posts: 5,089
Thanks: 6
Thanked 736 Times in 483 Posts
|
Rod et al, I do have some of Steinar's NOS original Mauser front sight blades as well as other used ones, available here in the USA. I would have to know the height required in order to assist. If you can find the correct shoulder stock for your Navy, most ranges would WANT you to fire a stocked pistol on the rifle side. Lugerdoc
|
04-25-2008, 11:23 PM | #10 |
User
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: The Edge of Texas
Posts: 514
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Tom, I bought a supposed repro navy stock, but the iron doesn't fit the gun.
|
04-26-2008, 03:00 AM | #11 |
FIREARM HISTORIAN AND AUT
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Belgium
Posts: 1,535
Thanks: 106
Thanked 349 Times in 129 Posts
|
Rod,
I can suggest to you to use the stock made by Odin based on Mauser design. They fit quite well although the attaching stock part of the Mauser Parabellum is not completely equal to the Imperial model. Therefore you have to expect that the imperial stock or the reproduction do not fit properly without a little adjustment. Cheers, Mauro
__________________
Mauro Baudino - www.lugerlp08.com www.paul-mauser-archive.com Mauser Company and Firearm Historian - Mauser Parabellum Certification Service. |
04-27-2008, 11:49 PM | #12 |
User
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: The Edge of Texas
Posts: 514
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Thanks, Mauro. I keep thinking I'll modify it, but have too many projects and my health is hindering me.
|
04-28-2008, 01:44 AM | #13 |
Moderator
2010 LugerForum Patron Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Santa Teresa New Mexico just outside of the West Texas town of El Paso
Posts: 7,022
Thanks: 1,090
Thanked 5,178 Times in 1,703 Posts
|
Rod,
I would be happy to take a look at it to see if it can be modified to fit, and do the fitting if you would like. Let me know. Ron
__________________
If it's made after 1918...it's a reproduction |
04-28-2008, 05:46 AM | #14 |
User
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: The Edge of Texas
Posts: 514
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Hey, Ron, I'll probably take you up on that offer! Very generous of you.
It may be awhile before I'll be able to do this; however, as I need to go out of town for awhile to get a new prosthesis fitted. I will be in touch when things settle down. |
04-28-2008, 10:29 AM | #15 |
Patron
LugerForum Patron Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: POB 398 St.Charles,MO. 63302
Posts: 5,089
Thanks: 6
Thanked 736 Times in 483 Posts
|
Mauro et al, I've forund that the Odin repro stock irons seem to fit best on a Mauser PO8, even thought they are only considered legal with the correct DWM Po4 or LPO8. So some fitting will be required for them. TH
|
|
|