my profile |
register |
faq |
search upload photo | donate | calendar |
|
01-15-2008, 07:48 PM | #1 |
User
Join Date: Jun 2002
Posts: 1,632
Thanks: 1
Thanked 28 Times in 17 Posts
|
Gunbroker Krieghoff
|
01-16-2008, 12:22 AM | #2 |
RIP
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Dc 'burbs in Virginia
Posts: 2,482
Thanks: 0
Thanked 16 Times in 10 Posts
|
Ah yes.
Since I got into Kriegs a couple of years back, I have been dumfounded and gobsmacked by the market. I am just very glad I bought a bunch when I did! Tom A |
01-16-2008, 10:40 PM | #3 |
User
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: Texas
Posts: 424
Thanks: 15
Thanked 19 Times in 14 Posts
|
I really like these HK's, but I have no idea if this gun is the real deal or not. But, my point is, what if someone here bought that nice piece of history. Once it is imported, that damned import stamping has to be put on that! What a waste......
|
01-19-2008, 07:45 PM | #4 | |
User
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: FL
Posts: 201
Thanks: 5
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Quote:
__________________
"In a man to man fight the winner is the one who puts an extra round in his magazine" -Field Marshal Erwin Rommel |
|
02-10-2008, 12:53 PM | #5 |
User
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: North Dakota
Posts: 66
Thanks: 7
Thanked 6 Times in 6 Posts
|
I have a few questions regarding the commercial p-code HK's.
The rejection star signify's not acceptable for military use, was the reason for military rejection remedied, then sold as commercial? Were they sold with holster's, military or otherwise? Note subject luger has two mag's, no holster. Who typically bought these, military personnel responsible for buying thier own sidearm or regular folks? The examples seen in books seem to have been well taken care of, hardly used. Is the finish any better that military accepted HK's? Thanks, Jesse |
|
|