Tacfoley sends notice of a Borchardt for sale...

John Sabato · 04-02-2004, 01:52 PM

Here is the photo, I presume he will chime in here with a follow up post and tell us more about this current ad in a magazine he just received. ...and he also stated that this gun has NOT been deactivated.

wterrell · 04-02-2004, 10:27 PM

tac,
please satisfy our curiosity concerning the price that this pistol did fetch.

John D. · 04-02-2004, 11:00 PM

<blockquote>quote:<hr />Originally posted by John Sabato:
....Veneered Mr Sabato -<hr /></blockquote>Someday - I have to figure out what "Veneered " actually means...

Great "piccie"!! Also - if you collect early Lugers in your area of the world (pre-1918), are you able to maintain those without deactivation? While the whole subject of deactivation turns my stomach, I find it a fascinating subject at several levels, not least of which is turning to over-regulation and control to "appease" a minority of voters conscience. (excuse me, I could get on my soapbox - but I will refrain).

Outstanding piece - and John S. - thanks for posting... And TAC - thanks for sharing....

John

Edward Tinker · 04-03-2004, 12:06 PM

<blockquote>quote:<hr />Dear All - when I use the annuncatives 'steamed' or 'veneered' they are malapropisms for 'esteeemed' and 'revered'. We Celts are renowned for our word-play - this is simply one facet of it. If it offends any or all, I will cease immediately [after this, that is]. tac[/QB]<hr /></blockquote>Now, why would we want our steamed Celt to quit being hisself? That goes down the road of collectivism, communism, etc., ism and that would suck. Please don't have thin skin and let some odd questions from your brothers across the big waters influence you unduly

Ed

John D. · 04-03-2004, 02:42 PM

Dear veneered and esteemed Mr. Tacfoley (see - now that I know what it means - I can use it, although - most likely - I'll mis-use it more often then not. However - I do believe I found a new Scrabble word <img border="0" title="" alt="[Wink]" src="wink.gif" /> )...

Seriously - my thanks for the definition!!! Also, after reading your lengthy reply regarding ownership, I must say - I have to shake my head in amazement.... Frankly - I'm at a loss for words (well, almost at a loss for words).

So, the Government's position is that you are able to "shoot" a Luger, but only if you are not able to posses it within your house - and only "take possession" whilst under strict supervision???? AND - if you DO posses one that is "active" upon your property, it is a Federal crime to own a single round of live ammunition?

Simply amazing....

If you visit the US - please know - you have an open invitation to stay at my residence, and yes - we will go to the range for as many unsupervised hours as you would like. I promise not to even count the amount of ammunition used....

Tac - my thanks for your enlightening reply. I'm sure that I'm not alone when it comes to understanding how some Governments ursurp individual freedoms and rights.

My thanks again,

john

04-02-2004, 01:52 PM	#1
John Sabato Lifer Lifetime Forum Patron Join Date: Jun 2002 Location: The Capital of the Free World Posts: 10,154 Thanks: 3,003 Thanked 2,306 Times in 1,097 Posts	Tacfoley sends notice of a Borchardt for sale... Here is the photo, I presume he will chime in here with a follow up post and tell us more about this current ad in a magazine he just received. ...and he also stated that this gun has NOT been deactivated. __________________ regards, -John S "...We hold these truths to be self-evident that ALL men are created EQUAL *and are endowed by their Creator* with certain UNALIENABLE* rights, and among these are life, LIBERTY, and the pursuit of happiness..."*

04-02-2004, 10:27 PM	#2
wterrell User Join Date: Jun 2002 Location: Colorado Posts: 1,096 Thanks: 0 Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post	tac, please satisfy our curiosity concerning the price that this pistol did fetch. __________________ Noli me vocare, ego te vocabo, wes --------------------

04-02-2004, 11:00 PM	#3
John D. Administrator & Site Owner LugerForum Patron Join Date: Jun 2002 Location: A Little NE of Somewhere... Posts: 2,651 Thanks: 477 Thanked 515 Times in 128 Posts	</font><blockquote><font size="1" face="Verdana,Tahoma,Arial,Helvetica,Geneva">quote:</font><hr /><font size="2" face="Verdana,Tahoma,Arial,Helvetica,Geneva">Originally posted by John Sabato: <strong>....Veneered Mr Sabato -</strong></font><hr /></blockquote><font size="2" face="Verdana,Tahoma,Arial,Helvetica,Geneva">Someday - I have to figure out what "Veneered " actually means... Great "piccie"!! Also - if you collect early Lugers in your area of the world (pre-1918), are you able to maintain those without deactivation? While the whole subject of deactivation turns my stomach, I find it a fascinating subject at several levels, not least of which is turning to over-regulation and control to "appease" a minority of voters conscience. (excuse me, I could get on my soapbox - but I will refrain). Outstanding piece - and John S. - thanks for posting... And TAC - thanks for sharing.... John

04-03-2004, 12:06 PM	#4
Edward Tinker Super Moderator Eternal Lifer LugerForum Patron Join Date: Jun 2002 Location: North of Spokane, WA Posts: 15,935 Thanks: 2,033 Thanked 4,533 Times in 2,093 Posts	</font><blockquote><font size="1" face="Verdana,Tahoma,Arial,Helvetica,Geneva">quote:</font><hr /><font size="2" face="Verdana,Tahoma,Arial,Helvetica,Geneva">Dear All - when I use the annuncatives 'steamed' or 'veneered' they are malapropisms for 'esteeemed' and 'revered'. We Celts are renowned for our word-play - this is simply one facet of it. If it offends any or all, I will cease immediately [after this, that is]. tac[/QB]</font><hr /></blockquote><font size="2" face="Verdana,Tahoma,Arial,Helvetica,Geneva">Now, why would we want our steamed Celt to quit being hisself? That goes down the road of collectivism, communism, etc., ism and that would suck. Please don't have thin skin and let some odd questions from your brothers across the big waters influence you unduly Ed __________________ Edward Tinker ************ Co-Author of Police Lugers - Co-Author of Simson Lugers Author of Veteran Bring Backs Vol I, Vol II, Vol III and Vol IV

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode

04-03-2004, 02:42 PM	#5
John D. Administrator & Site Owner LugerForum Patron Join Date: Jun 2002 Location: A Little NE of Somewhere... Posts: 2,651 Thanks: 477 Thanked 515 Times in 128 Posts	Dear veneered and esteemed Mr. Tacfoley (see - now that I know what it means - I can use it, although - most likely - I'll mis-use it more often then not. However - I do believe I found a new Scrabble word <img border="0" title="" alt="[Wink]" src="wink.gif" /> )... Seriously - my thanks for the definition!!! Also, after reading your lengthy reply regarding ownership, I must say - I have to shake my head in amazement.... Frankly - I'm at a loss for words (well, almost at a loss for words). So, the Government's position is that you are able to "shoot" a Luger, but only if you are not able to posses it within your house - and only "take possession" whilst under strict supervision???? AND - if you DO posses one that is "active" upon your property, it is a Federal crime to own a single round of live ammunition? Simply amazing.... If you visit the US - please know - you have an open invitation to stay at my residence, and yes - we will go to the range for as many unsupervised hours as you would like. I promise not to even count the amount of ammunition used.... Tac - my thanks for your enlightening reply. I'm sure that I'm not alone when it comes to understanding how some Governments ursurp individual freedoms and rights. My thanks again, john