LugerForum Discussion Forums my profile | register | faq | search
upload photo | donate | calendar

Go Back   LugerForum Discussion Forums > Luger Discussion Forums > Unit Markings

Reply
Thread Tools Display Modes
Unread 09-14-2014, 06:08 PM   #1
MD650
User
 
Join Date: Sep 2014
Posts: 10
Thanks: 3
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default Markings on a DWM

I´ve tried to identfy this marking on a DWM-P 08.
There is a DWM without any year markings.
Is there any one who has an idea what it might be?
Attached Thumbnails
Click image for larger version

Name:	P 08.jpg
Views:	78
Size:	113.7 KB
ID:	43269  

MD650 is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 09-14-2014, 06:25 PM   #2
JTD
User
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: PA
Posts: 425
Thanks: 217
Thanked 408 Times in 149 Posts
Default

A proof house marking I am pretty sure. I do not know who off hand. John
JTD is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 09-14-2014, 06:38 PM   #3
DavidJayUden
Patron
LugerForum
Patron
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 4,047
Thanks: 578
Thanked 1,414 Times in 887 Posts
Default

Does it appear that the date has been ground off? Any other proofs or acceptance markings? Stock lug? Serial number?
DavidJayUden is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 09-14-2014, 08:06 PM   #4
LU1900
User
 
LU1900's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: FRANCE
Posts: 908
Thanks: 42
Thanked 469 Times in 197 Posts
Default

Belgian issue
Attached Thumbnails
Click image for larger version

Name:	LP belgian frame.jpg
Views:	70
Size:	120.6 KB
ID:	43270  

__________________
Best regards from France...Patrice
https://www.fichier-pdf.fr/2016/03/1...nd-snail-drum/
LU1900 is offline   Reply With Quote
The following 4 members says Thank You to LU1900 for your post:
Unread 09-15-2014, 06:47 AM   #5
MD650
User
 
Join Date: Sep 2014
Posts: 10
Thanks: 3
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by DavidJayUden View Post
Does it appear that the date has been ground off? Any other proofs or acceptance markings? Stock lug? Serial number?
No, there is no trace of any date on the gun.
And there is only that marking.
There is same serial number on all parts on the gun except the barell.
According to one source the barell has been changed.
MD650 is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 09-15-2014, 08:30 AM   #6
John Sabato
Lifer
Lifetime Forum
Patron
 
John Sabato's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: The Capital of the Free World
Posts: 10,154
Thanks: 3,003
Thanked 2,306 Times in 1,097 Posts
Default

IMHO The cursive capital "L" inside the proof mark stands for the Liege Belgium proof house. More photographs of the area above and both sides of the chamber are needed to be sure but just with the photo already provided of the top of the chamber I believe the date has been polished off before this proofmark was applied. There are minute traces of polishing or fine sanding visible below the blue in this area and the receiver corner reliefs appear "softened" instead of sharp.

Just my tuppence !
__________________
regards, -John S

"...We hold these truths to be self-evident that ALL men are created EQUAL and are endowed by their Creator with certain UNALIENABLE rights, and among these are life, LIBERTY, and the pursuit of happiness..."
John Sabato is offline   Reply With Quote
The following 2 members says Thank You to John Sabato for your post:
Unread 09-15-2014, 09:20 AM   #7
alanint
User
 
alanint's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Marco Island, Florida
Posts: 4,867
Thanks: 1,685
Thanked 1,916 Times in 1,192 Posts
Default

I agree with John in all respects.
alanint is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 09-15-2014, 11:03 AM   #8
MD650
User
 
Join Date: Sep 2014
Posts: 10
Thanks: 3
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

Thanks for the help so far.
I took some more pictures and hope they are in some way helping to get some more information about the back ground of this gun.
Attached Thumbnails
Click image for larger version

Name:	Luger 2.jpg
Views:	71
Size:	50.3 KB
ID:	43297  

Click image for larger version

Name:	luger 3.jpg
Views:	67
Size:	58.1 KB
ID:	43298  

Click image for larger version

Name:	2014-09-15 15.53.41.jpg
Views:	71
Size:	96.1 KB
ID:	43299  

MD650 is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 09-15-2014, 11:05 AM   #9
MD650
User
 
Join Date: Sep 2014
Posts: 10
Thanks: 3
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

Last picture.
Attached Thumbnails
Click image for larger version

Name:	2014-09-15 15.52.00.jpg
Views:	99
Size:	102.4 KB
ID:	43300  

MD650 is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 09-15-2014, 11:23 AM   #10
DavidJayUden
Patron
LugerForum
Patron
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 4,047
Thanks: 578
Thanked 1,414 Times in 887 Posts
Default

The photos suggest a different degree of polish to the barrel than to the rest of the gun. Blued small parts but polished or strawed extractor, and I'm still on the fence regarding whether or not the date has been removed.
More photos, including the witness mark, will help confirm or dispel such notions.
dju
DavidJayUden is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 09-15-2014, 11:35 AM   #11
MD650
User
 
Join Date: Sep 2014
Posts: 10
Thanks: 3
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by DavidJayUden View Post
More photos, including the witness mark, will help confirm or dispel such notions.
dju
As I understand the barrel is not the original one.

Where schould the witness mark be?
MD650 is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 09-15-2014, 12:16 PM   #12
John Sabato
Lifer
Lifetime Forum
Patron
 
John Sabato's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: The Capital of the Free World
Posts: 10,154
Thanks: 3,003
Thanked 2,306 Times in 1,097 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by MD650 View Post
As I understand the barrel is not the original one.

Where schould the witness mark be?
Bottom of the barrel... there will be a small notch which should line up with a similar notch on the upper receiver when installed.

Here is an example from an older thread:

__________________
regards, -John S

"...We hold these truths to be self-evident that ALL men are created EQUAL and are endowed by their Creator with certain UNALIENABLE rights, and among these are life, LIBERTY, and the pursuit of happiness..."
John Sabato is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 09-15-2014, 02:23 PM   #13
MD650
User
 
Join Date: Sep 2014
Posts: 10
Thanks: 3
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

Ok, I got it now.
As you can see there is no correct proof mark.
So the barrel is not the original one.
Attached Thumbnails
Click image for larger version

Name:	luger 5.jpg
Views:	71
Size:	79.4 KB
ID:	43305  


Last edited by MD650; 09-15-2014 at 04:57 PM.
MD650 is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 09-15-2014, 03:34 PM   #14
DavidJayUden
Patron
LugerForum
Patron
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 4,047
Thanks: 578
Thanked 1,414 Times in 887 Posts
Default

So we know it has been rebarrelled and refinished. Whether the date has been ground off remains unknown, but my guess it that it has been. The right side MAY show spots where the original acceptance marks were filled prior to re-blue (your 4th photo) and at some point in time it ended up in Belgium.
I forget, what was the question?
dju
DavidJayUden is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 09-15-2014, 03:49 PM   #15
MD650
User
 
Join Date: Sep 2014
Posts: 10
Thanks: 3
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by DavidJayUden View Post
I forget, what was the question?
dju
My first question was about the marking ( the L inside a flaming grenade).

And of course I´d like to know as much as possible about the gun.
MD650 is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 09-15-2014, 04:18 PM   #16
DavidJayUden
Patron
LugerForum
Patron
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 4,047
Thanks: 578
Thanked 1,414 Times in 887 Posts
Default

Wild guess here, but I'll speculate that it was a WW1 German military pistol that somehow ended up in Belgium, passing thru their proof testing, being rebarreled and refinished along the way. Possibly used for military but I suspect it was more likely a commercial sale or a private war trophy.
Maybe some of our Euro. members can shed more light on under what circumstances those Belgium proofs are applied.
Anyway, that's my story and I'm sticking to it.
dju
DavidJayUden is offline   Reply With Quote
The following member says Thank You to DavidJayUden for your post:
Unread 09-15-2014, 04:38 PM   #17
MD650
User
 
Join Date: Sep 2014
Posts: 10
Thanks: 3
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

Do you have any idea in what year it might be from?
Before 193x?
MD650 is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 09-15-2014, 05:41 PM   #18
DavidJayUden
Patron
LugerForum
Patron
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 4,047
Thanks: 578
Thanked 1,414 Times in 887 Posts
Default

With the military number system it would be early 1920's at the latest, but most likely 1914-1918.
dju
DavidJayUden is offline   Reply With Quote
The following member says Thank You to DavidJayUden for your post:
Unread 09-16-2014, 02:18 AM   #19
MD650
User
 
Join Date: Sep 2014
Posts: 10
Thanks: 3
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by DavidJayUden View Post
With the military number system it would be early 1920's at the latest, but most likely 1914-1918.
dju
Ok, thanks for the help.
MD650 is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 09-21-2014, 04:13 PM   #20
Diver6106
User
 
Diver6106's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: Mt. Vernon VA
Posts: 244
Thanks: 1,424
Thanked 117 Times in 75 Posts
Default

I have a matching AC41 P-38 with the same 'L flaming bomb' proof mark. I suspect it was pulled into service after the war in the rebuilding of Belgium. It also has German export marking 'WAFFSCHU DE 10', then was eventually imported into the US at C.A.I. Georgia VT.
Diver6106 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:06 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 1998 - 2024, Lugerforum.com