Another newbie auction buy. How did I do? - Page 2

thegundude · 04-30-2005, 11:40 PM

I sure haven't been able to find anything, not even mismatched junk Lugers, for less than $500, and that's why I was so leary once I learned my low bid actually won this one. :-O

I know it's no superstar collectable gun. I still can't really afford those yet. I'll get there one day, but right now I'm still learning about them and buying a multitude of other guns as well. I collect Colt Police Positives too. Don't ask me why, I just love them for some strange reason. Same deal with these Lugers, only stronger, if you can understand that.

You know what I really need to buy is a few books....

And I still don't have the gun yet..... :-P Now I can't freakin' wait.......... :-D

BTW, in case I've failed to mention this guys, I sure do like hangin' around here. Every post I read, I learn something.... :-) Thanks....

thegundude · 05-07-2005, 05:03 PM

Pics now....

http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v6...0Mleftside.jpg

http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v6...Mrightside.jpg

Ron Smith · 05-07-2005, 07:24 PM

Steve,
It looks a lot better in your photos. Hugh was right. 0000 steelwool and some good cold blue would really dress it up.

In case you don't already know this. Clean the areas with steelwool and run hot water on it to warm the metal and open the pores, dry it with paper towels. Apply the cold blue before it cools. The blue will take much better.

Ron

DougT · 05-07-2005, 09:01 PM

Steve, you owe it to yourself to examine a Thor restoration before you decide. And I guarantee you that if you hold a Thor restored Luger in your hands, you will no longer question if you should send it to him. It will simply be a matter of when can you send it.
DougT

Rod WMG · 05-08-2005, 12:25 AM

I vote for Thor!

thegundude · 05-08-2005, 12:41 AM

Guys, I'm confused....

I was under the impression that any kind of restoration, especially rebluing, was strictly verboten on anything collectable. Won't it ruin it's value?

I'm all for making it look as nice as possible. I'm already making plans to take some 0000 wool to it and clean it up as much as possible, but rebluing?

I've been doing amatuer gunsmithing for years. Nothing for profit mind you, but always using the part of the Hypocratic Oath "First, do no harm" in my work. For example I'd never try and reblue one of my Colt PPs.

I've built an AR from the ground up (okay, easy I know) and I've reblued countless guns and gun parts (and some things that aren't gun parts). "Fixed" so many guns by simply cleaning them I could have made a living off of that alone........ I know my way around most guns in a little more than just a very general way.

Am I missing something here? Or is this gun considered kind of "less collectable" and could benefit more from a restoration than it could be hurt by it? ...

thegundude · 05-08-2005, 12:43 AM

I'd love for it to look like new again, I'm just afraid of hurting any collector value it might have, if any at all.....

DougT · 05-08-2005, 01:25 AM

Steve,
Value is subjective. Your 1920 Commercial is at the absolute bottom of the matching number Luger food chain, simply because there were so many of them made. On the other hand, your Luger is an excellent example of the general type, and will make for a very sweet gun to own and enjoy. Last year I purchased a 1923 Commercial .30 in about 95% condition. This gun is identical to yours except for it's year of manufacture and condition. I paid more than twice for it than what you paid. As soon as Thor finishes the restoration he is currently doing for me, I plan to send him this gun because I want it to be 100%. My Lugers have the value that I give them, not necessarily what the market dictates. Again, I urge you to contact someone in your area who wouldn't mind showing you a Thor restoration, and all your questions will be answered. If you can't find anyone in your neighborhood, get a cheap flight to Los Angeles and I'll be happy to show you my Thor restored Lugers. You have to see them to believe them, and then you won't want anything less.
DougT

thegundude · 05-08-2005, 10:32 AM

That's true, value is subjective. But Blue Book value isn't.

My fear is that fifty years hence when I'm long gone and my SO is selling off my collection to pay the bills (probably an Alaskan vacation, knowing her) that she doesn't have to hear, "Oh, I'd grab up that 1920 Luger becasue it's been reblued and that kills the collector value." I know that I've said it before about many guns....

Would it look prettier on my wall? No question. Would I be happy with the rework? Almost certainly.

Would it lower it's resale value (comparitive to the cost of refurb) is what I don't know.....

DougT · 05-08-2005, 02:48 PM

Steve,
Thor optionally puts his refinisher mark on the guns. In 10 or 20 years, this mark will be the equivalent of having an original, signed Picasso. How's that for "Blue Book value?"
DougT

thegundude · 05-08-2005, 02:56 PM

Hmmm..... Actually, you make a good point. :-/ I may have to consider that.

Aaron · 05-08-2005, 02:56 PM

The more common the Luger, the more the true collector demands it be in as perfectly original condition as possible. The rarer the Luger, the more a true collector will tolerate less than perfect condition. Your 1920 is only moderately collectible even in perfect original condition. The fact is, your Luger is useful only for plinking at the range and would only be of interest to a shooter or perhaps to an accumulator who wants to own something from the Luger family just as a conversation piece, even if refinished. You may get a cheap $75 Bubba reblue or spend around $400 or more for a professional restoration. In either case, a true collector will have virtually no interest as he will probably be able to discern that the finish is not original. Save your money for a nice Luger with a decent original finish, preferably in 9mm. Many are available at around $800, and if you can't find one, I'm sure some of us on this forum can help you.

DougT · 05-08-2005, 03:06 PM

I am building my collection from Thor restored guns. Give me 10 years, and they will command a higher price than any of their "original" counterparts. My restored Luger can beat up your original Luger!
DougT

thegundude · 05-08-2005, 04:42 PM

Aaron, fortunately for me, it was my intention to buy this one for shooting. I figured that $500 for a shooter is a little high, but it was a matching shooter. :-) Now of course, my education is expanding and I'm thinking of having Thor spend some time on it. To me, they're all valuable.... Even if some of them are like the ugly kids.... :-P

I do have a 1938, 42 code that's in a little better shape than this one.

http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v6...s/DSCF0746.jpg

http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v6...09leftside.jpg

I paid $750 for it and I'm pretty pleased. I know it's only one rung above the 1920 Commercial, but I'm just starting.... I'll probably pick up at least one more this year. But I'm afraid I'm going to have to spend some money on that one..... :-/

Doug, when I have Thor do his thing, I'll ask him to knock his proof into it.... My thinking on that will be right along side yours. It may be the most common thype of Luger, but it's been reworked by a master. Like having Stradivarius fix your old clunker violin.... :-)

Edward Tinker · 05-08-2005, 05:02 PM

Steve, when you post a picture, can you post it here? That way, the picture stays as long as the thread. I have seen many photos disappear (guy thinks it is taking up space on his site, it "times out" and disappears, site overloads and blows up, etc), yet these threads remain...

Ed

thegundude · 05-08-2005, 05:16 PM

Sure thing Ed.

I was just trying to make it easier on those with slow connections....

Aaron · 05-08-2005, 10:50 PM

Looks like a pretty decent Luger to me. Does it have any problems?

Edward Tinker · 05-08-2005, 10:55 PM

thanks Steve, uh, actually meant posting it to the thread, that way, as long as the thread remains, the pictures remain. Lots of guys take their picture down after a month or so, which defeats the long-term use of this site as a learning tool.

BTW, I already copied them and posted them here

As jpg's, they were half the size

Ed

thegundude · 05-08-2005, 11:27 PM

Thanks Ed. I'm not sure how to post it to the thread, not having done that yet, but next go 'round I'll give it a look for... :-)

Aaron, that one is my 1939, 42 code. It seems okay to me, but I've only put one mag through it so far. I probably won't shoot it again.

The other one, the recently acquired 1920 DWM in .30, I haven't shot it yet. My thumb is still healing after a recently sustained cut.... A rather deep one I'm afraid. I'll have to wait a bit longer to see how it shoots, if at all....

thegundude · 06-13-2005, 06:31 PM

Okay, I've shot the gun and it works great. Actually shoots dead on. I think this one might go to Thor soon.....

04-30-2005, 11:40 PM	#21
thegundude User Join Date: Jan 2005 Location: Western NC Posts: 1,137 Thanks: 3 Thanked 16 Times in 3 Posts	I sure haven't been able to find anything, not even mismatched junk Lugers, for less than $500, and that's why I was so leary once I learned my low bid actually won this one. :-O I know it's no superstar collectable gun. I still can't really afford those yet. I'll get there one day, but right now I'm still learning about them and buying a multitude of other guns as well. I collect Colt Police Positives too. Don't ask me why, I just love them for some strange reason. Same deal with these Lugers, only stronger, if you can understand that. You know what I really need to buy is a few books.... And I still don't have the gun yet..... :-P Now I can't freakin' wait.......... :-D BTW, in case I've failed to mention this guys, I sure do like hangin' around here. Every post I read, I learn something.... :-) Thanks.... __________________ Keep your knees in the breeze and your iron in the air. ~Steve

05-07-2005, 05:03 PM	#22
thegundude User Join Date: Jan 2005 Location: Western NC Posts: 1,137 Thanks: 3 Thanked 16 Times in 3 Posts	Pics now.... http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v6...0Mleftside.jpg http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v6...Mrightside.jpg __________________ Keep your knees in the breeze and your iron in the air. ~Steve

05-07-2005, 07:24 PM	#23
Ron Smith User Join Date: Feb 2004 Location: Orygun Posts: 4,243 Thanks: 118 Thanked 245 Times in 150 Posts	Steve, It looks a lot better in your photos. Hugh was right. 0000 steelwool and some good cold blue would really dress it up. In case you don't already know this. Clean the areas with steelwool and run hot water on it to warm the metal and open the pores, dry it with paper towels. Apply the cold blue before it cools. The blue will take much better. Ron __________________ I Still Need DWM side plate #49... if anyone runs across a nice one. What ~Rudyard Kipling~ said...

05-08-2005, 12:41 AM	#26
thegundude User Join Date: Jan 2005 Location: Western NC Posts: 1,137 Thanks: 3 Thanked 16 Times in 3 Posts	Guys, I'm confused.... I was under the impression that any kind of restoration, especially rebluing, was strictly verboten on anything collectable. Won't it ruin it's value? I'm all for making it look as nice as possible. I'm already making plans to take some 0000 wool to it and clean it up as much as possible, but rebluing? I've been doing amatuer gunsmithing for years. Nothing for profit mind you, but always using the part of the Hypocratic Oath "First, do no harm" in my work. For example I'd never try and reblue one of my Colt PPs. I've built an AR from the ground up (okay, easy I know) and I've reblued countless guns and gun parts (and some things that aren't gun parts). "Fixed" so many guns by simply cleaning them I could have made a living off of that alone........ I know my way around most guns in a little more than just a very general way. Am I missing something here? Or is this gun considered kind of "less collectable" and could benefit more from a restoration than it could be hurt by it? ... __________________ Keep your knees in the breeze and your iron in the air. ~Steve

05-08-2005, 12:43 AM	#27
thegundude User Join Date: Jan 2005 Location: Western NC Posts: 1,137 Thanks: 3 Thanked 16 Times in 3 Posts	I'd love for it to look like new again, I'm just afraid of hurting any collector value it might have, if any at all..... __________________ Keep your knees in the breeze and your iron in the air. ~Steve

05-07-2005, 09:01 PM	#24
DougT User Join Date: Oct 2003 Location: So. Cal. Posts: 171 Thanks: 0 Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts	Steve, you owe it to yourself to examine a Thor restoration before you decide. And I guarantee you that if you hold a Thor restored Luger in your hands, you will no longer question if you should send it to him. It will simply be a matter of when can you send it. DougT

05-08-2005, 12:25 AM	#25
Rod WMG User Join Date: Nov 2004 Location: The Edge of Texas Posts: 514 Thanks: 0 Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts	I vote for Thor!

05-08-2005, 01:25 AM	#28
DougT User Join Date: Oct 2003 Location: So. Cal. Posts: 171 Thanks: 0 Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts	Steve, Value is subjective. Your 1920 Commercial is at the absolute bottom of the matching number Luger food chain, simply because there were so many of them made. On the other hand, your Luger is an excellent example of the general type, and will make for a very sweet gun to own and enjoy. Last year I purchased a 1923 Commercial .30 in about 95% condition. This gun is identical to yours except for it's year of manufacture and condition. I paid more than twice for it than what you paid. As soon as Thor finishes the restoration he is currently doing for me, I plan to send him this gun because I want it to be 100%. My Lugers have the value that I give them, not necessarily what the market dictates. Again, I urge you to contact someone in your area who wouldn't mind showing you a Thor restoration, and all your questions will be answered. If you can't find anyone in your neighborhood, get a cheap flight to Los Angeles and I'll be happy to show you my Thor restored Lugers. You have to see them to believe them, and then you won't want anything less. DougT

05-08-2005, 10:32 AM	#29
thegundude User Join Date: Jan 2005 Location: Western NC Posts: 1,137 Thanks: 3 Thanked 16 Times in 3 Posts	That's true, value is subjective. But Blue Book value isn't. My fear is that fifty years hence when I'm long gone and my SO is selling off my collection to pay the bills (probably an Alaskan vacation, knowing her) that she doesn't have to hear, "Oh, I'd grab up that 1920 Luger becasue it's been reblued and that kills the collector value." I know that I've said it before about many guns.... Would it look prettier on my wall? No question. Would I be happy with the rework? Almost certainly. Would it lower it's resale value (comparitive to the cost of refurb) is what I don't know..... __________________ Keep your knees in the breeze and your iron in the air. ~Steve

05-08-2005, 02:48 PM	#30
DougT User Join Date: Oct 2003 Location: So. Cal. Posts: 171 Thanks: 0 Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts	Steve, Thor optionally puts his refinisher mark on the guns. In 10 or 20 years, this mark will be the equivalent of having an original, signed Picasso. How's that for "Blue Book value?" DougT

05-08-2005, 02:56 PM	#31
thegundude User Join Date: Jan 2005 Location: Western NC Posts: 1,137 Thanks: 3 Thanked 16 Times in 3 Posts	Hmmm..... Actually, you make a good point. :-/ I may have to consider that. __________________ Keep your knees in the breeze and your iron in the air. ~Steve

05-08-2005, 02:56 PM	#32
Aaron Banned Join Date: Jun 2002 Location: Vista, CA Posts: 1,008 Thanks: 0 Thanked 9 Times in 9 Posts	The more common the Luger, the more the true collector demands it be in as perfectly original condition as possible. The rarer the Luger, the more a true collector will tolerate less than perfect condition. Your 1920 is only moderately collectible even in perfect original condition. The fact is, your Luger is useful only for plinking at the range and would only be of interest to a shooter or perhaps to an accumulator who wants to own something from the Luger family just as a conversation piece, even if refinished. You may get a cheap $75 Bubba reblue or spend around $400 or more for a professional restoration. In either case, a true collector will have virtually no interest as he will probably be able to discern that the finish is not original. Save your money for a nice Luger with a decent original finish, preferably in 9mm. Many are available at around $800, and if you can't find one, I'm sure some of us on this forum can help you.

05-08-2005, 03:06 PM	#33
DougT User Join Date: Oct 2003 Location: So. Cal. Posts: 171 Thanks: 0 Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts	I am building my collection from Thor restored guns. Give me 10 years, and they will command a higher price than any of their "original" counterparts. My restored Luger can beat up your original Luger! DougT

05-08-2005, 04:42 PM	#34
thegundude User Join Date: Jan 2005 Location: Western NC Posts: 1,137 Thanks: 3 Thanked 16 Times in 3 Posts	Aaron, fortunately for me, it was my intention to buy this one for shooting. I figured that $500 for a shooter is a little high, but it was a matching shooter. :-) Now of course, my education is expanding and I'm thinking of having Thor spend some time on it. To me, they're all valuable.... Even if some of them are like the ugly kids.... :-P I do have a 1938, 42 code that's in a little better shape than this one. http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v6...s/DSCF0746.jpg http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v6...09leftside.jpg I paid $750 for it and I'm pretty pleased. I know it's only one rung above the 1920 Commercial, but I'm just starting.... I'll probably pick up at least one more this year. But I'm afraid I'm going to have to spend some money on that one..... :-/ Doug, when I have Thor do his thing, I'll ask him to knock his proof into it.... My thinking on that will be right along side yours. It may be the most common thype of Luger, but it's been reworked by a master. Like having Stradivarius fix your old clunker violin.... :-) __________________ Keep your knees in the breeze and your iron in the air. ~Steve

05-08-2005, 05:02 PM	#35
Edward Tinker Super Moderator Eternal Lifer LugerForum Patron Join Date: Jun 2002 Location: North of Spokane, WA Posts: 15,935 Thanks: 2,034 Thanked 4,533 Times in 2,093 Posts	Steve, when you post a picture, can you post it here? That way, the picture stays as long as the thread. I have seen many photos disappear (guy thinks it is taking up space on his site, it "times out" and disappears, site overloads and blows up, etc), yet these threads remain... Ed

05-08-2005, 05:16 PM	#36
thegundude User Join Date: Jan 2005 Location: Western NC Posts: 1,137 Thanks: 3 Thanked 16 Times in 3 Posts	Sure thing Ed. I was just trying to make it easier on those with slow connections.... __________________ Keep your knees in the breeze and your iron in the air. ~Steve

05-08-2005, 10:50 PM	#37
Aaron Banned Join Date: Jun 2002 Location: Vista, CA Posts: 1,008 Thanks: 0 Thanked 9 Times in 9 Posts	Looks like a pretty decent Luger to me. Does it have any problems?

05-08-2005, 10:55 PM	#38
Edward Tinker Super Moderator Eternal Lifer LugerForum Patron Join Date: Jun 2002 Location: North of Spokane, WA Posts: 15,935 Thanks: 2,034 Thanked 4,533 Times in 2,093 Posts	thanks Steve, uh, actually meant posting it to the thread, that way, as long as the thread remains, the pictures remain. Lots of guys take their picture down after a month or so, which defeats the long-term use of this site as a learning tool. BTW, I already copied them and posted them here As jpg's, they were half the size Ed

05-08-2005, 11:27 PM	#39
thegundude User Join Date: Jan 2005 Location: Western NC Posts: 1,137 Thanks: 3 Thanked 16 Times in 3 Posts	Thanks Ed. I'm not sure how to post it to the thread, not having done that yet, but next go 'round I'll give it a look for... :-) Aaron, that one is my 1939, 42 code. It seems okay to me, but I've only put one mag through it so far. I probably won't shoot it again. The other one, the recently acquired 1920 DWM in .30, I haven't shot it yet. My thumb is still healing after a recently sustained cut.... A rather deep one I'm afraid. I'll have to wait a bit longer to see how it shoots, if at all.... __________________ Keep your knees in the breeze and your iron in the air. ~Steve

06-13-2005, 06:31 PM	#40
thegundude User Join Date: Jan 2005 Location: Western NC Posts: 1,137 Thanks: 3 Thanked 16 Times in 3 Posts	Okay, I've shot the gun and it works great. Actually shoots dead on. I think this one might go to Thor soon..... __________________ Keep your knees in the breeze and your iron in the air. ~Steve