Luger Frame Tooling Marks Study - Page 2

Vlim · 07-13-2010, 11:45 AM

Marc,

Your grandfather was probably closer to the german techniques than you may realize:

The basis for German norm-based engineering and production was laid by Ludwig Loewe in the late 1880s. He had a Sewing Machine factory in Berlin and went to the USA to study the American mass production techniques that came into being around the civil war.

Armed with his knowledge of American mass production techniques, coupled with his own ideas on enforcing quality control he returned to Berlin and started changing his company production methods. Loewe's norm approach was the basis of the German DIN norm, and it also laid the foundations of the mass production of complex engineering designs in Germany, of which the Luger pistol is still a very good example. Loewe quickly found that there was more money in arms than in sewing machines. Sadly for Ludwig Loewe is that he died relatively young. His brother Isidor Loewe would turn the company into a larger conglomorate.

Loewe stood a the cradle of DWM and owned DWM until 1928. The Loewe company was forced to merger with AEG in the late 1930s, but regained it's independance after the war. It celebrated it's 100th anniversary in 1969 and lives on as part of DIAG to this day.

123 · 07-14-2010, 07:05 AM

Just an observation,

But the Eurfurt appears to have no machine marks, looks like untouched casting, is this normal? is this just my eyes???

123 · 07-14-2010, 07:31 AM

Sorry, I ment untouched forging.

Vlim · 07-14-2010, 08:34 AM

I noticed this as well, and I was thinking that perhaps they sandblasted the interior in order to smooth out the milling marks.

mrerick · 07-14-2010, 10:36 AM

The Erfurt is so smooth and square, and the end of the area is so abrupt, I though they must have used some kind of shaving or plow tool. My Erfurt was refinished at some very early point, probably when it was reworked as a police gun (It's marked to the Magdeberg district).

The Simson shows vertical marks in this area.

Marc

Norme · 07-14-2010, 02:09 PM

Hi Marc, As my contribution to this research, here is a photo of a 1937 Krieghoff. Regards, Norm

tau-delt · 07-14-2010, 03:31 PM

Later in Mauser production..... 42 BYF 7837g. Note mark in the middle somewhat different from the 1940 42 code but apparently stamped there for some reason.

mrerick · 07-21-2010, 10:26 PM

Norm and Dave, Thank you for your contributions.

This area, normally not externally visible, appears to be telling more about the workflow and process focus than other areas of our Lugers.

It looks rougher and done more quickly when there was probably more pressure on productivity in the factories.

Expedient as always, as long as the strength of the frame and adequate clearance was milled, the inspectors probably focused less on appearances here.

Marc

wlyon · 07-22-2010, 12:22 AM

There is an excellent write up and pictures of these differences in Randall Gibson's Krieghoff book. Bill

mrerick · 07-22-2010, 12:44 AM

I recently bought a copy of The Krieghoff Parabellum by Gibson. It is has a great series of comparison analysis discussions between manufacturers. These include photos of this frame area.

I hadn't seen it when I started this thread. I just noticed the differences and hoped the information was useful here...

Marc

mrerick · 07-23-2010, 01:12 PM

Norm, Thanks for the Krieghoff picture! Looks like they broached the inside frame edges and rear before milling the center channel.

Here's a 1936 Mauser P-08 in the "i" block:

This is consistent with the process at the end of production in 1942. These look like the center channel was milled followed by the rear and side broaching.

Marc

wlyon · 07-27-2010, 12:16 AM

Marc
Didn't mean to negate any of your study with the Gibson reference. I'm sure a lot of the collectors do not have his book. Your pictures are better anyway. Thanks Bill

mrerick · 07-27-2010, 12:46 PM

Bill, no issue here... I'm just glad that I can contribute something useful!

sheepherder · 01-27-2011, 06:30 PM

I read this thread some time back but didn't think I had anything to add...but I was looking at what I've always thought was my 'commercial' P08, particularly at the big relief area between the frame ears (which has no purpose), and I noticed that the cutter mark was odd...It looks like whoever ran the mill ran the cutter into the frame at the end of the cut...but the mark doesn't look like an end-cutting end mill...

(And although the receiver has the C/N, the frame serial is 6782/n)...

Mk VII · 11-23-2011, 04:50 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Edward Tinker

I had heard this also, and would love to see these documents...

See the article on the Vickers Luger by Dr. S.C. Sambrook in Vol.4 No.1 of the Journal of the Historical Breechloading Smallarms Association which discusses the new evidence from the Vickers Board of Directors' meeting Minute book, presently held at Cambridge University Library, Department of Manuscripts and University Archives, ref. GB 012 MS.Vickers

http://archiveshub.ac.uk/data/gb012ms.vickers

mrerick · 12-22-2011, 07:10 PM

This is the rear frame machining on my 1906/24 Swiss Luger manufactured by Waffenfabrik Bern in 1923...

Ed Mc · 01-18-2012, 09:32 AM

In reading this thread I noticed a reference to the Mauser production of the late sixties/early seventies. Perhaps you have seen the following linked article, perhaps not. I found it of some interest.

Scroll down the page to 'The Parabellum Story' and click on the page to download the article in PDF format.

http://www.forgottenweapons.com/earl...loading-pistol

mrerick · 07-29-2012, 12:46 PM

Here's the milled rear receiver area of Interarms Mauser 06/29 Luger sn 10.002185. It's a .30 Luger (7.65) caliber pistol. Made in 1971.

mrerick · 08-26-2012, 10:29 AM

A recently posted forum discussion included this picture of a M1900 American Eagle s/n 8372 frame rear area:

Marc

sheepherder · 08-26-2012, 10:55 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mk VII

See the article on the Vickers Luger by Dr. S.C. Sambrook in Vol.4 No.1 of the Journal of the Historical Breechloading Smallarms Association which discusses the new evidence from the Vickers Board of Directors' meeting Minute book, presently held at Cambridge University Library, Department of Manuscripts and University Archives, ref. GB 012 MS.Vickers

http://archiveshub.ac.uk/data/gb012ms.vickers

That particular manuscript doesn't appear to be accessible online, only in person...

It may be that there are digital copies available for the archives that you are intersted in, but that they are not displayed on or linked to from the Hub. You would need to contact the holding repository to find out more. Click on the link to 'Contact the repository' from the top of the description.

Would you have a digital copy of this document???

07-14-2010, 02:09 PM	#26
Norme Always A Lifetime Forum Patron Join Date: Jul 2009 Location: Colorado Posts: 2,417 Thanks: 226 Thanked 2,603 Times in 933 Posts	Hi Marc, As my contribution to this research, here is a photo of a 1937 Krieghoff. Regards, Norm Attached Thumbnails

07-14-2010, 03:31 PM	#27
tau-delt User Join Date: Aug 2002 Location: Ohio Posts: 106 Thanks: 0 Thanked 11 Times in 7 Posts	Later in Mauser production..... 42 BYF 7837g. Note mark in the middle somewhat different from the 1940 42 code but apparently stamped there for some reason. Attached Thumbnails __________________ dave

07-22-2010, 12:22 AM	#29
wlyon Lifer 2X Lifetime Forum Patron Join Date: May 2005 Location: Somewhere in Montana Posts: 2,636 Thanks: 3,174 Thanked 2,559 Times in 955 Posts	There is an excellent write up and pictures of these differences in Randall Gibson's Krieghoff book. Bill __________________ Bill Lyon

07-27-2010, 12:16 AM	#32
wlyon Lifer 2X Lifetime Forum Patron Join Date: May 2005 Location: Somewhere in Montana Posts: 2,636 Thanks: 3,174 Thanked 2,559 Times in 955 Posts	Marc Didn't mean to negate any of your study with the Gibson reference. I'm sure a lot of the collectors do not have his book. Your pictures are better anyway. Thanks Bill __________________ Bill Lyon

01-27-2011, 06:30 PM	#34
sheepherder Lifer Lifetime Forum Patron Join Date: Feb 2009 Location: ...on the 'ol Erie Canal... Posts: 8,183 Thanks: 1,400 Thanked 4,442 Times in 2,330 Posts	I read this thread some time back but didn't think I had anything to add...but I was looking at what I've always thought was my 'commercial' P08, particularly at the big relief area between the frame ears (which has no purpose), and I noticed that the cutter mark was odd...It looks like whoever ran the mill ran the cutter into the frame at the end of the cut...but the mark doesn't look like an end-cutting end mill... (And although the receiver has the C/N, the frame serial is 6782/n)... Attached Thumbnails __________________ I like my coffee the way I like my women... ...Cold and bitter...

07-13-2010, 11:45 AM	#21
Vlim Moderator Lifetime LugerForum Patron Join Date: Oct 2002 Location: Europe Posts: 5,053 Thanks: 1,036 Thanked 3,988 Times in 1,205 Posts	Marc, Your grandfather was probably closer to the german techniques than you may realize: The basis for German norm-based engineering and production was laid by Ludwig Loewe in the late 1880s. He had a Sewing Machine factory in Berlin and went to the USA to study the American mass production techniques that came into being around the civil war. Armed with his knowledge of American mass production techniques, coupled with his own ideas on enforcing quality control he returned to Berlin and started changing his company production methods. Loewe's norm approach was the basis of the German DIN norm, and it also laid the foundations of the mass production of complex engineering designs in Germany, of which the Luger pistol is still a very good example. Loewe quickly found that there was more money in arms than in sewing machines. Sadly for Ludwig Loewe is that he died relatively young. His brother Isidor Loewe would turn the company into a larger conglomorate. Loewe stood a the cradle of DWM and owned DWM until 1928. The Loewe company was forced to merger with AEG in the late 1930s, but regained it's independance after the war. It celebrated it's 100th anniversary in 1969 and lives on as part of DIAG to this day.

07-14-2010, 07:05 AM	#22
123 User Join Date: May 2009 Posts: 8 Thanks: 1 Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post	Just an observation, But the Eurfurt appears to have no machine marks, looks like untouched casting, is this normal? is this just my eyes???

07-14-2010, 07:31 AM	#23
123 User Join Date: May 2009 Posts: 8 Thanks: 1 Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post	Sorry, I ment untouched forging.

07-14-2010, 08:34 AM	#24
Vlim Moderator Lifetime LugerForum Patron Join Date: Oct 2002 Location: Europe Posts: 5,053 Thanks: 1,036 Thanked 3,988 Times in 1,205 Posts	I noticed this as well, and I was thinking that perhaps they sandblasted the interior in order to smooth out the milling marks.

07-14-2010, 10:36 AM	#25
mrerick Super Moderator - Patron LugerForum Life Patron Join Date: Dec 2009 Location: Eastern North Carolina, USA Posts: 3,909 Thanks: 1,374 Thanked 3,110 Times in 1,510 Posts	The Erfurt is so smooth and square, and the end of the area is so abrupt, I though they must have used some kind of shaving or plow tool. My Erfurt was refinished at some very early point, probably when it was reworked as a police gun (It's marked to the Magdeberg district). The Simson shows vertical marks in this area. Marc

07-21-2010, 10:26 PM	#28
mrerick Super Moderator - Patron LugerForum Life Patron Join Date: Dec 2009 Location: Eastern North Carolina, USA Posts: 3,909 Thanks: 1,374 Thanked 3,110 Times in 1,510 Posts	Norm and Dave, Thank you for your contributions. This area, normally not externally visible, appears to be telling more about the workflow and process focus than other areas of our Lugers. It looks rougher and done more quickly when there was probably more pressure on productivity in the factories. Expedient as always, as long as the strength of the frame and adequate clearance was milled, the inspectors probably focused less on appearances here. Marc

07-22-2010, 12:44 AM	#30
mrerick Super Moderator - Patron LugerForum Life Patron Join Date: Dec 2009 Location: Eastern North Carolina, USA Posts: 3,909 Thanks: 1,374 Thanked 3,110 Times in 1,510 Posts	I recently bought a copy of The Krieghoff Parabellum by Gibson. It is has a great series of comparison analysis discussions between manufacturers. These include photos of this frame area. I hadn't seen it when I started this thread. I just noticed the differences and hoped the information was useful here... Marc

07-23-2010, 01:12 PM	#31
mrerick Super Moderator - Patron LugerForum Life Patron Join Date: Dec 2009 Location: Eastern North Carolina, USA Posts: 3,909 Thanks: 1,374 Thanked 3,110 Times in 1,510 Posts	Norm, Thanks for the Krieghoff picture! Looks like they broached the inside frame edges and rear before milling the center channel. Here's a 1936 Mauser P-08 in the "i" block: This is consistent with the process at the end of production in 1942. These look like the center channel was milled followed by the rear and side broaching. Marc

07-27-2010, 12:46 PM	#33
mrerick Super Moderator - Patron LugerForum Life Patron Join Date: Dec 2009 Location: Eastern North Carolina, USA Posts: 3,909 Thanks: 1,374 Thanked 3,110 Times in 1,510 Posts	Bill, no issue here... I'm just glad that I can contribute something useful!

12-22-2011, 07:10 PM	#36
mrerick Super Moderator - Patron LugerForum Life Patron Join Date: Dec 2009 Location: Eastern North Carolina, USA Posts: 3,909 Thanks: 1,374 Thanked 3,110 Times in 1,510 Posts	Rear Frame of 1906/24 Swiss This is the rear frame machining on my 1906/24 Swiss Luger manufactured by Waffenfabrik Bern in 1923... Attached Thumbnails __________________ Igitur si vis pacem, para bellum - - Therefore if you want peace, prepare for war.

01-18-2012, 09:32 AM	#37
Ed Mc User Join Date: Jan 2012 Location: Macon, GA Posts: 10 Thanks: 4 Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post	In reading this thread I noticed a reference to the Mauser production of the late sixties/early seventies. Perhaps you have seen the following linked article, perhaps not. I found it of some interest. Scroll down the page to 'The Parabellum Story' and click on the page to download the article in PDF format. http://www.forgottenweapons.com/earl...loading-pistol Last edited by Ed Mc; 01-18-2012 at 09:34 AM. Reason: error correction

07-29-2012, 12:46 PM	#38
mrerick Super Moderator - Patron LugerForum Life Patron Join Date: Dec 2009 Location: Eastern North Carolina, USA Posts: 3,909 Thanks: 1,374 Thanked 3,110 Times in 1,510 Posts	Mauser Interarms Luger 10.002185 Here's the milled rear receiver area of Interarms Mauser 06/29 Luger sn 10.002185. It's a .30 Luger (7.65) caliber pistol. Made in 1971. Attached Thumbnails __________________ Igitur si vis pacem, para bellum - - Therefore if you want peace, prepare for war.

08-26-2012, 10:29 AM	#39
mrerick Super Moderator - Patron LugerForum Life Patron Join Date: Dec 2009 Location: Eastern North Carolina, USA Posts: 3,909 Thanks: 1,374 Thanked 3,110 Times in 1,510 Posts	A recently posted forum discussion included this picture of a M1900 American Eagle s/n 8372 frame rear area: Marc __________________ Igitur si vis pacem, para bellum - - Therefore if you want peace, prepare for war.