my profile |
register |
faq |
search upload photo | donate | calendar |
02-04-2010, 12:11 PM | #1 |
Moderator
Lifetime LugerForum Patron Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Europe
Posts: 5,053
Thanks: 1,036
Thanked 3,989 Times in 1,205 Posts
|
Erma Subcalibre set: getting there
Thanks to Ed I'm one step closer to completing a .22lr setup for my P08.
The first tests went well, and with the stock attached it is a real tack driver, very accurate. Accessories in the picture include the Erma M30 .22lr system, a copy of the 1936 Erma sales brochure, a photo of a German soldier using the M30 and perhaps the rarest of subcalibre accessories: the RG34a, a cleaning kit based on the RG34 but meant for cleaning subcalibre systems. Enjoy (I did ). |
02-04-2010, 12:14 PM | #2 |
Super Moderator
Eternal Lifer LugerForum Patron Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: North of Spokane, WA
Posts: 15,935
Thanks: 2,034
Thanked 4,533 Times in 2,093 Posts
|
Outstanding! Just need a couple of magazines now
Ed
__________________
Edward Tinker ************ Co-Author of Police Lugers - Co-Author of Simson Lugers Author of Veteran Bring Backs Vol I, Vol II, Vol III and Vol IV |
02-04-2010, 04:56 PM | #3 |
User
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Texas
Posts: 552
Thanks: 13
Thanked 69 Times in 57 Posts
|
That is a really nice set. Though I haven't a kit for a Luger, I have sub-caliber kits for several other pistols and use them regularly. The rarest of which is a .22 conversion for a Makarov.
Charlie |
02-09-2010, 11:53 AM | #4 |
Moderator
Lifetime LugerForum Patron Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Europe
Posts: 5,053
Thanks: 1,036
Thanked 3,989 Times in 1,205 Posts
|
Forum member G.T. was kind enough to get me a magazine for the set, so here are some preliminary observations, as it is the first set I got to handle freely
Initially I didn't understand why the ejector spring should have been removed permanently, as the toggle action of the set clears the ejector spring in a way that suggest that it was designed with the ejector in mind. Of course, for placing the barrel, the ejector must be removed. After I got the magazine I noticed why the ejector is indeed best removed: The magazine is a complicated little device that not only serves as a magazine, but it also doubles as an ejector and a holdopen device. Truly a 3-in-one design. Clever. What I also liked about the design is the inclusion of a spring loaded receiver stop. The construction of the firing pin is somewhat complex and also the extractor design is a bit overengineered. Some 50 test rounds showed that even without a magazine to serve as an ejector the pistol would actually eject the rounds about 50% of the time, so I expect that with the magazine it will function much better. It is a pity that the barrel insert only supports 9mm barrels, it would have been fun to be able to install it in a .30 luger variation as well. Shooting cheap lead bullet .22lr rounds does produce an unwanted side effect. The inside of the pistol's frame looks like it was never cleaned in 70 years, just after shooting one box So a good cleaning set is a requisite if you shoot the .22lr set regularly. All in all I am pleasantly surprised by the design and the accuracy it produces at the range. No wonder that Mauser seriously contemplated reviving the .22lr version as part of their post war Parabellum range in the 1970s. |
02-09-2010, 02:25 PM | #5 |
FIREARM HISTORIAN AND AUT
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Belgium
Posts: 1,535
Thanks: 106
Thanked 349 Times in 129 Posts
|
Gerben,
I like the set! Well done. Mauro
__________________
Mauro Baudino - www.lugerlp08.com www.paul-mauser-archive.com Mauser Company and Firearm Historian - Mauser Parabellum Certification Service. |
02-11-2010, 09:09 AM | #6 |
Moderator
Lifetime LugerForum Patron Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Europe
Posts: 5,053
Thanks: 1,036
Thanked 3,989 Times in 1,205 Posts
|
Wel, got to fight to get to the range through some serious snow on icy roads but it was worth the effort.
With standard CCI standard velocity .22lr (the stuff we sell at the club range) the pistol performed almost flawlessly. On 50 rounds I had to close the toggle manually once, as the round didn't feed all the way. Repeating was outstandig, ejection of the rounds went perfect and the accuracy is still quite impressive. I also tried a couple of 'American Eagle' high velocity rounds, but they don't work very well. It seems that the Erma set is balanced on standard velocity rounds, so I will stick to the CCI's for now. |
02-25-2010, 06:06 PM | #7 |
User
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Europe
Posts: 34
Thanks: 2
Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
|
Vlim, maybe you need some original .22lfb ammo from 1943 to test it. Very accurate after 67 years.
|
04-30-2010, 11:16 AM | #8 |
Moderator
Lifetime LugerForum Patron Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Europe
Posts: 5,053
Thanks: 1,036
Thanked 3,989 Times in 1,205 Posts
|
A small update.
An interesting design feature that I hadn't noticed before became obvious at the range last week. After firing some 25 shots, I had a failure to extract the last round. Nothing curious, as it can happen. When I put down the gun, I noticed somethig odd: The barrel insert was missing. Had another look and saw that the chamber side of the insert was still there. Puzzled, I started my search down the indoor range and found that the barrel insert had launched itself from the barrel, landing some 5 yards further. The barrel insert is actually not a 1-piece deal, but rather a separate barrel that has been press fitted into the chamber part. I included a detail scan of an Erma drawing of the set. The red part is the barrel, the yellow part is the one-piece chamber insert. It seems that, for some reason, the insert had worked it's way loose and the pressure of the last round was enough to launch both the round and the barrel insert forwards (the round exited the barrel insert normally). I think that this design feature really isn't such a good idea. I pressed the barrel back into place and will do some further testing to see if it works loose again. It should be easy to find a way to fixate the barrel to the chamber part, and I wonder why Erma cut corners here? Or perhaps the barrel insert will work it's way out every 75 years |
The following member says Thank You to Vlim for your post: |
04-30-2010, 11:34 AM | #9 |
User
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Marco Island, Florida
Posts: 4,867
Thanks: 1,685
Thanked 1,916 Times in 1,192 Posts
|
Charlie, (ICE)
I hate to rain on your Makarov subcaliber kit, but Sportsmansguide is selling complete Makarov subcaliber kits in a fitted case for $239.97 http://shop.sportsmansguide.com/net/cb/cb.aspx?a=647739 |
04-30-2010, 11:45 AM | #10 |
Moderator
Lifetime LugerForum Patron Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Europe
Posts: 5,053
Thanks: 1,036
Thanked 3,989 Times in 1,205 Posts
|
Even more fun is the electronic training device for the Makarov.
|
04-30-2010, 01:54 PM | #11 |
User
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Marco Island, Florida
Posts: 4,867
Thanks: 1,685
Thanked 1,916 Times in 1,192 Posts
|
Interesting...
Does it function with beam of light on a sensitive target technology? |
04-30-2010, 04:56 PM | #12 |
Moderator
Lifetime LugerForum Patron Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Europe
Posts: 5,053
Thanks: 1,036
Thanked 3,989 Times in 1,205 Posts
|
It's just an elaborate light switch, really. The flash is really bright. No idea about the use of light sensitive targets.
|
06-06-2010, 08:59 AM | #13 |
Moderator
Lifetime LugerForum Patron Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Europe
Posts: 5,053
Thanks: 1,036
Thanked 3,989 Times in 1,205 Posts
|
Back to the .22lr stuff.
I picked up a pretty old box of DWM / BKIW .22lr dating from the 1920s. Giveways are the company name on the box 'Berlin Karlsruhe Industrie Werke A.-G. früher Deutsche Waffen -u Munitionsfabriken Karlsruhe i B' and the relatively small box size. They made the box as small as possible while still being able to stuff 50 rounds in it. With 64 x 34mm it is quite a bit smaller than it's later 72 x 37mm counterpart. |
06-06-2010, 02:25 PM | #14 |
Lifer
Lifetime Forum Patron Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Chandler Arizona
Posts: 3,507
Thanks: 1,318
Thanked 3,653 Times in 1,004 Posts
|
spare parts...
Gerben, it the .22 conv. kit barrel is not solid after repair, drop me a note... as I still have some "magic" left in my little parts bucket! .. best to you, til...lat'r...GT
|
06-06-2010, 03:21 PM | #15 |
Moderator
Lifetime LugerForum Patron Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Europe
Posts: 5,053
Thanks: 1,036
Thanked 3,989 Times in 1,205 Posts
|
GT, you are too kind!! I'll keep it in mind (still have to call my gun smith to check if he made any progress).
|
06-06-2010, 04:25 PM | #16 | |
User
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Texas
Posts: 552
Thanks: 13
Thanked 69 Times in 57 Posts
|
Alan, that is interesting to know. I might get another kit even. The one I have now was bought new for $125.00 back several years ago. I wonder where SG is getting their kits or if they are new production.
Its new production; I looked. Thanks! Charlie Quote:
|
|
06-06-2010, 04:26 PM | #17 |
User
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Texas
Posts: 552
Thanks: 13
Thanked 69 Times in 57 Posts
|
Dang it! I sold a complete Interarms .22 conversion kit for a 4" 9mm back several years ago. At least it went to a good home.
Charlie |
06-06-2010, 04:52 PM | #18 |
Lifer
Lifetime Forum Patron Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Chandler Arizona
Posts: 3,507
Thanks: 1,318
Thanked 3,653 Times in 1,004 Posts
|
kit bbl...
Hi Gerben, don't put to much into it... I'll take care of you... let me know.. best to all, til...lat'r...GT
|
|
|