my profile |
register |
faq |
search upload photo | donate | calendar |
10-21-2006, 04:24 PM | #1 |
User
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Massachusetts
Posts: 149
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
I.M.A.A. ....06 Navy
Just a test photo on my newest Navy piece.
|
10-21-2006, 04:27 PM | #2 |
User
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Massachusetts
Posts: 149
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Picture #2
|
10-21-2006, 04:29 PM | #3 |
User
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Massachusetts
Posts: 149
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Picture #3
|
10-21-2006, 04:31 PM | #4 |
User
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Massachusetts
Posts: 149
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Picture #4
|
10-21-2006, 04:33 PM | #5 |
User
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Massachusetts
Posts: 149
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
The reason for all this testing is ther fact that Mr. Ed Tinker is sitting here actually teaching me how to post oictures
|
10-21-2006, 06:42 PM | #6 |
User
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: San Mateo, California
Posts: 1,432
Thanks: 2
Thanked 71 Times in 56 Posts
|
Page 74 of Jeff Noll's Regimental Markings: "Matrosen-Artillerie-Abteilung I, Waffe Nr. 16". This is one beautiful 1906 Navy!
|
10-21-2006, 08:02 PM | #7 |
RIP
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Dc 'burbs in Virginia
Posts: 2,482
Thanks: 0
Thanked 16 Times in 10 Posts
|
Simply lovely!
Tom A |
10-22-2006, 12:07 AM | #8 |
Super Moderator
Eternal Lifer LugerForum Patron Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: North of Spokane, WA
Posts: 15,935
Thanks: 2,034
Thanked 4,533 Times in 2,093 Posts
|
Had a great time with Leo today, he was very generous, showed me his entire collection, and many other things. A true gentleman, his wife is very lovely and friendly and they fed me and we traded lies, I mean stories all day. Very nice,
Ed
__________________
Edward Tinker ************ Co-Author of Police Lugers - Co-Author of Simson Lugers Author of Veteran Bring Backs Vol I, Vol II, Vol III and Vol IV |
10-22-2006, 12:08 PM | #9 |
User
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Leland NC 28451
Posts: 1,017
Thanks: 1
Thanked 13 Times in 12 Posts
|
A joy to behold Leo
|
10-22-2006, 03:50 PM | #10 |
User
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Massachusetts
Posts: 149
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
10-22-2006, 04:04 PM | #11 |
User
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: The USA
Posts: 5,919
Thanks: 0
Thanked 6 Times in 4 Posts
|
|
10-22-2006, 04:07 PM | #12 |
User
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: The USA
Posts: 5,919
Thanks: 0
Thanked 6 Times in 4 Posts
|
Nevermind...I found Jan Still's posting, below, in another thread :
" IMPERIAL NAVY C/Ms The following paragraph noting the observed differences in the Imperial Navy C/Ms is based on limited observations. Any corrections, criticism or additions would be greatly appreciated. Thanks Jan Based on the examination of Imperial Navy Lugers there are differences in the C/M inspection stamps. The 1904 and early 1906 Variations (up to between serial number 790a and 7909a) have what collectors have termed a â??three lobeâ? style stamp (three lobes in the crown). The later 1906 Variation, the 1908, 1914, 1908 Navy Commercial and P08 Variations have what collectors have termed the â??pentagonâ? style stamp (a pentagon shape with cross, in the crown). These two stamp styles may be mixed on the early1906 Variation, with three lobe and pentagon style inspection stamps being applied to the same Luger. The three lobe stamps have the crown slightly above the M on the 1904 and first1906 production. Later 1906 production has the three lobe stamp tighter to the M. Even later 1906 production has the pentagon style C/M with the crown closer to the M as does the 1908 Variation. Observed 1916 and 1917 dated, and 1908 Navy Commercial and P08 Variations have the Crown tight to the M. " |
|
|