Mexico Disregards U.S. Law

[Mauser720]

Mexico Disregards U.S. Law

In another chapter in the ongoing attempt to blame the American gun community for Mexico's internal strife, CBS News reports that the Mexican government has retained the New York City-based law firm of Reid Collins & Tsai to examine its options for suing U.S. gun manufacturers and distributors. This report describes Mexico's actions as a "novel approach," in reality, such lawsuits have been used for decades as a tactic by anti-gun groups and governments in their attempts to bankrupt gun manufacturers and circumvent the political process.

That's why Congress passed the "Protection of Lawful Commerce in Arms Act" in 2005. This act protects firearms manufacturers, distributors, dealers and importers from suits brought about as a result of "the harm solely caused by the criminal or unlawful misuse of firearm products or ammunition products by others when the product functioned as designed and intended." The outlook for a Mexican government suit looks dim; since the PLCAA was signed into law by President George W. Bush on Oct. 26, 2005, no federal court has allowed such a suit by a government plaintiff to go forward against a U.S. firearms manufacturer.

Sourece: National Rifle Association - April 22, 2011

[Wilhelm]

If I were filthy rich, I'd hire a bunch of goons to sue the Mexican govt. for allowing illegal immigrants and drugs into the USA.

[nukem556]

no, you'd need to sue Bush, Bush Jr, Clinton and Obama for ALLOWING illegal immigrants and drugs into the US....the primary duty of the President is to defend the borders....they violated their oaths and are guilty of dereliction of duty.

[silverknife]

Originally Posted by Mauser720

Mexico Disregards U.S. Law

In another chapter in the ongoing attempt to blame the American gun community for Mexico's internal strife, CBS News reports that the Mexican government has retained the New York City-based law firm of Reid Collins & Tsai to examine its options for suing U.S. gun manufacturers and distributors. This report describes Mexico's actions as a "novel approach," in reality, such lawsuits have been used for decades as a tactic by anti-gun groups and governments in their attempts to bankrupt gun manufacturers and circumvent the political process.

That's why Congress passed the "Protection of Lawful Commerce in Arms Act" in 2005. This act protects firearms manufacturers, distributors, dealers and importers from suits brought about as a result of "the harm solely caused by the criminal or unlawful misuse of firearm products or ammunition products by others when the product functioned as designed and intended." The outlook for a Mexican government suit looks dim; since the PLCAA was signed into law by President George W. Bush on Oct. 26, 2005, no federal court has allowed such a suit by a government plaintiff to go forward against a U.S. firearms manufacturer.

Sourece: National Rifle Association - April 22, 2011

Two of the Nine Justices of the Supreme Court are Clinton appointees and two are President Obama's. One more Obama appointee and we could see the Court strike that statute down with some Constitutional slight of hand and restrict the application of the D.C. handgun decision supporting the 2nd Amendment, thus encouraging a renewed and revitalized assault on the 2nd Amendment.

Just saying.

Regards,
Doug