LugerForum Discussion Forums my profile | register | faq | search
upload photo | donate | calendar

Go Back   LugerForum Discussion Forums > General Discussion Forums > Off Topic & Other Firearms

Reply
Thread Tools Display Modes
Unread 05-14-2011, 11:08 AM   #1
Mauser720
User
 
Mauser720's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Kansas
Posts: 535
Thanks: 18
Thanked 49 Times in 33 Posts
Exclamation Self-Defense Law Suit in Illinois

NRA Files Suit Against Unconstitutional Ban
on Carrying Firearms for Self-Defense in Illinois

Fairfax, Va. -- The National Rifle Association is funding and supporting a lawsuit that challenges the constitutionality of Illinois’ complete and total ban on carrying firearms for self-defense outside the home. The case, filed today in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Illinois, is Shepard v. Madigan. The lead plaintiff is church treasurer Mary Shepard; joining her is the Illinois State Rifle Association, the NRA’s state affiliate.

Mary Shepard is an Illinois resident and a trained gun owner with no criminal record, who is licensed to carry a concealed handgun in two other states. Because Illinois remains the only state that completely prohibits all law-abiding citizens from carrying firearms for self-defense outside the home, Mary Shepard also became a crime victim. While working as the treasurer of her church, Mrs. Shepard and an 83-year-old co-worker were viciously attacked and beaten by a six-foot-three-inch, 245-pound man with a violent past and a criminal record. Mrs. Shepard and her co-worker were lucky to survive, as each of them suffered major injuries to the head, neck and upper body. Mrs. Shepard’s injuries required extensive surgery and physical therapy.

“Mary Shepard isn't just a victim of the violent criminal who attacked her," said Chris W. Cox, executive director of NRA’s Institute for Legislative Action. "She is also a victim of anti self-defense activists in the Illinois legislature who have consistently refused to recognize that good people have the right to protect themselves when they go about their everyday business. We're pleased that the legislature has come closer this year than ever before to changing the law, but close isn't good enough for Mary Shepard and the thousands of other Illinois residents who are prohibited by statute from defending themselves outside the home."

Because Illinois statutes prohibit the right to keep and bear arms and the ability to carry handguns in Illinois, they infringe on the right of the people, including Mrs. Shepard, members of the ISRA and other law-abiding citizens to keep and bear arms as guaranteed by the Second and Fourteenth Amendments to the United States Constitution and are thus null and void.

Cox concluded: "In its historic Heller and McDonald decisions, the U.S. Supreme Court made clear that the Second Amendment protects a fundamental, individual right to keep and bear arms. Mary Shepard's story highlights the need for law-abiding citizens to be able to fully exercise their Second Amendment rights. Whether through the legislature or through the courts, we won't rest until that happens."

The NRA has also filed or supported the following cases to preserve Second Amendment freedoms across the United States since the historic Heller and McDonald rulings, and expects to file more in the coming months:

Benson v. City of Chicago, challenging Chicago's unconstitutionally burdensome handgun restrictions;

Heller v. District of Columbia (Heller II), challenging Washington, D.C.'s overly restrictive firearm registration requirements and ban on commonly owned rifles;

Jackson v. City of San Francisco, challenging that city's gun storage and ammunition regulations;

Jane Doe v. Wilmington Housing Authority, challenging prohibitions on firearms ownership in Delaware public housing;

Jennings v. Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives, challenging the federal law that prohibits law-abiding adults between the ages of 18-20 from buying handguns from licensed dealers;

NRA v. McCraw, challenging Texas' law that bans issuance of handgun carry permits to 18-20 year old adults; and

Peruta v. City of San Diego, challenging that city's refusal to issue handgun carry permits to law-abiding applicants.

-- NRA--

Established in 1871, the National Rifle Association is America’s oldest civil rights and sportsmen's group. Four million members strong, NRA continues its mission to uphold Second Amendment rights and to advocate enforcement of existing laws against violent offenders to reduce crime. The Association remains the nation's leader in firearm education and training for law-abiding gun owners, law enforcement and the military.
__________________
Mauser720 - Ron
"Those who do not know history are doomed to repeat it."
Mauser720 is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 05-15-2011, 12:55 PM   #2
mrerick
Super Moderator - Patron
LugerForum
Life Patron
 
mrerick's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Eastern North Carolina, USA
Posts: 3,909
Thanks: 1,374
Thanked 3,110 Times in 1,510 Posts
Default

Ron,

Thanks for posting this. I'm happy to see someone with direct interest (Mary Shepard) challenging the Illinois position on self defense carry.

I recently videotaped Alan Gura (the lawyer that brought the Chicago MacDonald lawsuit and the Washington Heller lawsuits) discussing his efforts, the overall efforts of the gun rights community and the NRA.

The video is at: YouTube (click here) and was videotaped at the recent Grass Roots North Carolina dinner.

The net of his address that night was to warn about problems that happen when an organization that is focused on political lobbying gets involved with constitutional litigation.

They are two different things. They have very different impact and long term effects. They are done in different ways.

I'm a Life NRA member, and a NRA certified instructor. I urge members here to view Alan's short video and get in touch with the NRA about their litigation activities.

Marc
__________________
Igitur si vis pacem, para bellum -
- Therefore if you want peace, prepare for war.
mrerick is offline   Reply With Quote
The following 2 members says Thank You to mrerick for your post:
Unread 05-15-2011, 08:20 PM   #3
Arizona Slim
Patron
LugerForum
Patron
 
Arizona Slim's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Illinois
Posts: 706
Thanks: 1,026
Thanked 409 Times in 225 Posts
Default

This is my first post, although a member of this forum for the past several years and I sincerely apologize if my response is not in the appropriate place or out of line in any way.
I offer my thanks to both of these gentelmen, Ron & Marc for their posts. I am, unfortunately, a resident of Illinois (downstate), I say "unfortunately" because we have had to live under the thumb of two very powerful and very anti-gun mayors for a combined total of 43 years that actually made the decisions for the entire state. I am referring of course to Richard J. Daley, 21 years and his son, Richard M. Daley, 22 years, Mayors of Chicago and now followed by their carbon copy, Rahm Emanual. Our Govenor, Pat Quinn has refused to sign any pro-gun legislation that crosses his desk. I'm afraid that unless we are successful in this upcoming court battle their will continue to be many more Mary Shephards. I have been a member of the NRA since 1961 and will continue to give my support.
Arizona Slim is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 05-15-2011, 09:22 PM   #4
mrerick
Super Moderator - Patron
LugerForum
Life Patron
 
mrerick's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Eastern North Carolina, USA
Posts: 3,909
Thanks: 1,374
Thanked 3,110 Times in 1,510 Posts
Default

Hi Lonnie, and good to hear from you.


My family is from Greene County and Pike County Illinois in the West Central part of the state.

I'm from Evanston, Illinois. When I was in High School in the 1960's I learned to shoot in the basement of the High School using their DCM rifles. My biology teacher was our coach.

Clearly, much has changed for the worse in Illinois. I consider Illinois the poster child for what's wrong with 2nd amendment rights in the USA.

These issues need to be taken on. If it's done properly, these rights will be restored to law abiding citizens. If it's done inexpertly, things could be significantly set back.

And that's the point that Alan Gura makes.

Marc
__________________
Igitur si vis pacem, para bellum -
- Therefore if you want peace, prepare for war.
mrerick is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 05-16-2011, 11:19 AM   #5
Arizona Slim
Patron
LugerForum
Patron
 
Arizona Slim's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Illinois
Posts: 706
Thanks: 1,026
Thanked 409 Times in 225 Posts
Default

Marc, thank you for your reply, it's good to hear from someone that understands the problems that gun owners in Illinois are up against.

Lonnie
Arizona Slim is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:07 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 1998 - 2024, Lugerforum.com