LugerForum Discussion Forums my profile | register | faq | search
upload photo | donate | calendar

Go Back   LugerForum Discussion Forums > Luger Discussion Forums > Artillery Lugers

Reply
Thread Tools Display Modes
Unread 02-05-2012, 07:46 PM   #1
nukem556
User
 
nukem556's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Irmo, SC
Posts: 625
Thanks: 35
Thanked 168 Times in 107 Posts
Default Placement of Artillery sight

Something has puzzled me for a while....why didnt they place the rear sight for the Artillery in the back like a Navy? I'm assuming the rationale for the Artillery is for soldiers to be able to reach out at further distances than a normal pistol. The longest possible sight radius allows for better practical accuracy. If you look at it, a Navy actually has a LONGER sight radius!
nukem556 is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 02-05-2012, 08:27 PM   #2
sheepherder
Lifer
Lifetime Forum
Patron
 
sheepherder's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: ...on the 'ol Erie Canal...
Posts: 8,183
Thanks: 1,400
Thanked 4,442 Times in 2,330 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by nukem556 View Post
...why didnt they place the rear sight for the Artillery in the back like a Navy?
Doesn't the carbine have the rear sight on the barrel as well???

I'd guess having the sight on a stable base was more important than a long sight radius...
__________________
I like my coffee the
way I like my women...
...Cold and bitter...
sheepherder is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 02-05-2012, 10:58 PM   #3
nukem556
User
 
nukem556's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Irmo, SC
Posts: 625
Thanks: 35
Thanked 168 Times in 107 Posts
Default

yeah Rich, true about the production carbines, but the earliest ones had a rear mounted tangent sight....Teddy Roosevelts was such a model
nukem556 is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 02-05-2012, 11:29 PM   #4
DavidJayUden
Patron
LugerForum
Patron
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 4,047
Thanks: 578
Thanked 1,414 Times in 887 Posts
Default

The rear sight needs to be a ways away from the eye in order to be seen in focus. It becomes useless if you put a stock on and the rear sight is right in front of the eye. Not that a few inches does much good, at least not with these tired old eyes...
Now without the use of a shoulder stock, then you have a very good point.
dju
DavidJayUden is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 02-06-2012, 02:32 AM   #5
Ron Wood
Moderator
2010 LugerForum
Patron
 
Ron Wood's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Santa Teresa New Mexico just outside of the West Texas town of El Paso
Posts: 7,022
Thanks: 1,090
Thanked 5,178 Times in 1,703 Posts
Default

The tangent mounted rear sights of the Navy and early carbine Lugers were much lighter and more robust than the ladder sights of the LP08 and could withstand the shock of the toggle action. There is no way that the heavy ladder type sight of the LP08 would have held up to the inertial forces imparted by the moving parts of the toggle assembly.

The increased sight radius necessary for precise aiming was achieved by the longer barrel of the “Artillery” Luger. The extreme range promised by the LP08 sight is certainly optimistic; however I would not want to be on the receiving end of a shot by a skilled marksman using the extended range offered by the LP08 sights.
__________________
If it's made after 1918...it's a reproduction
Ron Wood is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 02-06-2012, 10:01 AM   #6
DavidJayUden
Patron
LugerForum
Patron
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 4,047
Thanks: 578
Thanked 1,414 Times in 887 Posts
Default

When discussing the optimism of the 800M range of the LP08, let's not forget the strategic use of indirect fire at that time. Sometimes simply "raining down bullets" was part of the plan.
dju
DavidJayUden is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 02-06-2012, 11:07 AM   #7
Norme
Always A
Lifetime Forum
Patron
 
Norme's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Colorado
Posts: 2,417
Thanks: 226
Thanked 2,603 Times in 933 Posts
Default

There's a lot of interesting stuff about the development of the LP08 in the new Görtz/Sturgess book. Apparently it was initially intended for arming air crew as well as artillery men, and the testing commission reported that "one hit per eight shots fired could be expected at 500 meters, cockpit to cockpit". For ground use, head sized targets could be engaged at 600 meters, and standing targets at 800 meters. In penetration tests it was found that the 9mm parabellum round would pierce a French infantry helmet at 800 meters.
I can't believe that any of this is realistic, and if it hadn't been for the development of the drum magazine which enabled the LP08 to be an effective trench clearing tool, it would soon have been rendered obsolete. Regards, Norm
Norme is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 02-06-2012, 11:12 AM   #8
chromeed
User
 
chromeed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: North Georgia
Posts: 81
Thanks: 1
Thanked 27 Times in 9 Posts
Default

I think I could hit a Zeppelin at 800 meters with my Artillery providid I attached the Stock and the 32 round Magazine.
__________________
Ed Reimbold I Need:
For my 1936 P-08 Mag #5800 will trade Mag Al Stamped Blue #6859 k Straight Eagle 655 & #3502 n+St Eagle 63
For my 1917 Artillary Wood Mag #9220 I have #3392 f +
chromeed is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 02-06-2012, 02:11 PM   #9
nukem556
User
 
nukem556's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Irmo, SC
Posts: 625
Thanks: 35
Thanked 168 Times in 107 Posts
Default

Ben.....sadly Roosevelt's Carbine has gone missing, presumably stolen by persons unknown. There is a picture in the Geortz/Sturgess "Pistole Parabellum" of TR's son Kermit
carrying it through the jungle during their epic South American expedition. It can be seen to have the early non-ramped front sight and the rear tangent mounted sight.

As a side point, the expedition was a mammoth undertaking, a grand and dangerous adventure ( see the 3rd book in Edmund Morris' great biography of TR) . Kermit proved himself worthy of his great father, and probably was the only reason TR survived the ordeal.
nukem556 is offline   Reply With Quote
The following member says Thank You to nukem556 for your post:
Unread 02-06-2012, 02:25 PM   #10
Ron Wood
Moderator
2010 LugerForum
Patron
 
Ron Wood's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Santa Teresa New Mexico just outside of the West Texas town of El Paso
Posts: 7,022
Thanks: 1,090
Thanked 5,178 Times in 1,703 Posts
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ben M. View Post
nukeum 556,

could you provide more info about the roosevelt carbine. particularly how we know what configuration. has this carbine shown up?
The case for the carbine still exists, I think in the Springfield museum but I could be wrong. The impression of the rear tangent sight is clearly visible in the case.
__________________
If it's made after 1918...it's a reproduction
Ron Wood is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 02-06-2012, 02:28 PM   #11
DavidJayUden
Patron
LugerForum
Patron
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 4,047
Thanks: 578
Thanked 1,414 Times in 887 Posts
Default

Yes that So. America trip was quite an undertaking. Some say it is what ultimately killed TR. Can't be certain about that however both TR and KR came back from Africa in grand (comparitively speaking) shape.
dju
DavidJayUden is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 06:01 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 1998 - 2024, Lugerforum.com