my profile |
register |
faq |
search upload photo | donate | calendar |
09-21-2005, 08:51 AM | #1 |
User
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Iowa
Posts: 768
Thanks: 0
Thanked 19 Times in 11 Posts
|
Wolff vs Mauser spring
Yes, it raises a question. Why did Wolff copy the Mauser spring for loaded force but in no other parameter? It's worth noting that in their specs most spring suppliers state loaded force but not the preload force. This seems to apply for recoil springs for any pistol, not just Lugers.
|
09-21-2005, 12:33 PM | #2 |
Lifer
Lifetime Forum Patron Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: The Capital of the Free World
Posts: 10,154
Thanks: 3,003
Thanked 2,306 Times in 1,097 Posts
|
From a manufacturing aspect, I would speculate that Wolff produces springs in the most economical manner that it can that will produce a functioning part... nothing more and nothing less... probably producing the spring EXACTLY as Mauser produced them would require a "tooling" change from what they can already do...
A couple of years of managing a manufacturing engineering department taught me that...
__________________
regards, -John S "...We hold these truths to be self-evident that ALL men are created EQUAL and are endowed by their Creator with certain UNALIENABLE rights, and among these are life, LIBERTY, and the pursuit of happiness..." |
09-23-2005, 09:55 AM | #3 |
Patron
LugerForum Patron Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: POB 398 St.Charles,MO. 63302
Posts: 5,089
Thanks: 6
Thanked 736 Times in 483 Posts
|
I have both the original WW2 era Mauser PO8 recoil springs @$15 each or new post war Mauser or new Wolff's @$10 each + S&H. Tom
|
09-28-2005, 06:23 PM | #4 |
User
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Iowa
Posts: 768
Thanks: 0
Thanked 19 Times in 11 Posts
|
Please delete, I'm hitting the wrong buttons again
Please delete, I'm hitting the wrong buttons again
|
|
|