my profile |
register |
faq |
search upload photo | donate | calendar |
11-11-2015, 09:53 PM | #1 |
User
Join Date: Nov 2014
Posts: 77
Thanks: 8
Thanked 43 Times in 18 Posts
|
Feeding P08 and P38, 115 FMJ Bullseye
I have a 1918 Erfurt P08 and a 1963 P38 with an aluminum frame
I took them shooting using my standard WWB equivalent load 115 FMJ, 4.6 grains of Bullseye and OAL 1.150. They shot fine, same recoil and report as WWB. But now I search and see suggestions to drop back to 3.7 or even as low as 3.5 grains. Is this because of the age of the weapons or the Luger design? At some minimum load, I am sure they will stop functioning. Thanks |
The following member says Thank You to P08Leder for your post: |
11-11-2015, 10:22 PM | #3 |
Super Moderator
Eternal Lifer LugerForum Patron Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: North of Spokane, WA
Posts: 15,935
Thanks: 2,033
Thanked 4,533 Times in 2,093 Posts
|
I think if its working, I'd leave it alone. However, when I used to reload I used to start light with a handful, then go higher until I had a reliable reload that was easier on the old action. However, many times folks say use WWB because its already an easy load.
I know that the aluminum frame has a reputation of cracking until there was a fix. I would have to look up which ones were affected and what the fix was.
__________________
Edward Tinker ************ Co-Author of Police Lugers - Co-Author of Simson Lugers Author of Veteran Bring Backs Vol I, Vol II, Vol III and Vol IV |
11-11-2015, 10:37 PM | #4 |
User
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: near Charlotte NC
Posts: 4,681
Thanks: 1,441
Thanked 4,350 Times in 2,040 Posts
|
You may not have much luck with lighter loads in the luger, they need good recoil to function;
however, I would go with the lightest I could in the aluminum frame P 38. The P 38 is more forgiving so you should be able to get a reliable lighter load. |
11-12-2015, 05:11 AM | #5 | |
User
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 1,225
Thanks: 2,679
Thanked 930 Times in 509 Posts
|
Quote:
Any working firearm can and will break parts with the passing of time. One of the reasons I select for shooters late Mauser made P.08s. They are also old, but not as old as WWI vintage pistols. |
|
11-12-2015, 07:18 AM | #6 |
Super Moderator - Patron
LugerForum Life Patron Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Eastern North Carolina, USA
Posts: 3,909
Thanks: 1,374
Thanked 3,110 Times in 1,510 Posts
|
P.1 Frame Reinforcement Hex Pin
The P.1 / Alloy framed P.38 pistols had to be reinforced with a hex steel pin due to frame damage caused when higher power loads (think +P or Nato power rounds) were used. It was placed just above the trigger guard.
Early pistols were retrofitted, later ones came this way from the factory. I've marked the pin in RED in this picture:
__________________
Igitur si vis pacem, para bellum - - Therefore if you want peace, prepare for war. |
The following member says Thank You to mrerick for your post: |
11-12-2015, 10:30 AM | #7 | |
User
Join Date: Nov 2014
Posts: 77
Thanks: 8
Thanked 43 Times in 18 Posts
|
Quote:
I guess I will start a ladder down on powder loads to find a minimum working load. I do not want to blow up these guns! |
|
11-12-2015, 12:43 PM | #8 |
User
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 1,225
Thanks: 2,679
Thanked 930 Times in 509 Posts
|
If you are using a load equivalent to WWB there should be no problem in your alloy frame P38. WWB is well below NATO standards.
|
The following member says Thank You to kurusu for your post: |
11-12-2015, 02:48 PM | #9 |
Patron
LugerForum Patron Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Az.
Posts: 2,291
Thanks: 2,709
Thanked 972 Times in 717 Posts
|
If you have developed an equivalent WWB 115gr load, I would not expect damage to either handgun using your loads. As above, these are old handguns, and they can/will break with usage and time.....they are just machines.
|
|
|