LugerForum Discussion Forums my profile | register | faq | search
upload photo | donate | calendar

Go Back   LugerForum Discussion Forums > Luger Discussion Forums > All Post-WWII Lugers

Reply
Thread Tools Display Modes
Unread 09-24-2002, 11:11 PM   #1
Dwight Gruber
User
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Portland, Oregon
Posts: 3,902
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1,318 Times in 431 Posts
Question Why Stainless??

Topic line sez it all, why are the current Lugers manufactured in stainless steel rather than...um, I guess, regular steel...does anybody have a real answer?

--Dwight
Dwight Gruber is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 09-24-2002, 11:42 PM   #2
Aaron
Banned
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Vista, CA
Posts: 1,008
Thanks: 0
Thanked 9 Times in 9 Posts
Post

I have often wondered the same thing, and have come up with a couple of guesses. First, stainless saves the cost of blueing. Secondly, these stainless guns are made with investment castings and CNC machines, and it may be that stainless is easier to work with using these procedures. Maybe one of our machinist or metallurgical engineer types can shed some light on this.
Aaron is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 09-25-2002, 08:30 AM   #3
wterrell
User
 
wterrell's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Colorado
Posts: 1,096
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Post

Guns are made of stainless because the owners do not take care of their guns. Stainless requires less maintenance.
__________________
Noli me vocare, ego te vocabo,
wes
--------------------
wterrell is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 09-25-2002, 09:16 AM   #4
unspellable
User
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Iowa
Posts: 768
Thanks: 0
Thanked 19 Times in 11 Posts
Post

Stainless is generally more difficult to machine. Note that in the case of a Smith & Wesson or Ruger where you can get essentially the same model in either stainless or blue, the stainless always costs a tad more. A lot of the early stainless revolvers had problems with tool chatter. My guess is that the AIMCO's are stainless simply because it's the current fashion. My distant second guess might be that stainless lends itself better to casting.

As an additional point, I think a large percentage of the cost of a current model firearm these days is the liability premiums the manufacturer gets stuck with.
unspellable is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 09-26-2002, 10:31 AM   #5
DuaneD
New User
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Central Texas
Posts: 2
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Post

Dwight If you like I will ask Mr Romo of AIMCO. I hope tosee him at a gun Show Oct. 4
DuaneD is offline   Reply With Quote
Unread 09-26-2002, 10:43 AM   #6
Dwight Gruber
User
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Portland, Oregon
Posts: 3,902
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1,318 Times in 431 Posts
Post

DuaneD, of course, information from The Source would be illuminating. Also, I'm sure we'd all be interested in an update on the .45 .

Heck, I'd be interested in generally chatting him up about making and selling Lugers in the 21st century. It would seem to be such a marginal activity, and yet there seems to be the will and determination to do it. I'm fascinated to find out what is behind this dedication.

--Dwight
Dwight Gruber is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:18 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 1998 - 2024, Lugerforum.com